User avatar
Blackvegetable
Yesterday 9:11 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
57,243 posts
DeezerShoove » 25 minutes ago » wrote: As this thread is posed as a question, I will make a comparison in partisan logic.

1.) Conservatives used to oppose (vehemently) abortion. It was found over a fairly short timeframe that even conservatives found it to be a necessary procedure. So we are now at a stage where this acquiescence to a need outweighed a wish. A nod to human nature (mistakes, hormones, etc.) basically.

2.) Liberals have allowed wishes to overtake even their common sense (dubious as that is much of the time). The extreme and largely rejected notions of a few have yet to come full circle. See #1. It is hoped the next few months will be the slap to finally bring the hysterics to a close.

Conservatives can compromise even on something as deeply important as killing babies.
Can liberals manage the spine to compromise (or fully reject tantrum-fueled progressives)?

-------------

I see libs reject friends and family far more than any conservatives. That isn't "firm principles" in action.
That's usurped principles when you are basically talked into rejecting people in your life...
like having no principles at all.
But your "comparison" is illogical.

1).How have conservatives "acquiesced" to abortion? They spent decades stacking SCOTUS to achieve a single narrow end, and did it....under the shabby principle of State's rights..

Now they're losing in the states and demand rule changes.

I fail to see "acquiescence".
 
Updated 4 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search