Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

But I've seen this **** hundreds of times. 

 

YOU asked me how many guns I owned when I said I was not an ammosexual.  When I said the definition does not include a number and you for one you implied the number was not relevant.  Make up your **** mind, el Douche.

I don't see a number.  Remember, asshole, you wanted to know how many firearms I owned when I said I am not one.  Sto the **** lying.  Try again.  Also, I am not an extremm supporter of the gun cultrue or the right to bear arms.  Time for you to take a stand in a narrative fashion.

The definitions say nothing about the number of frirearms owned.  YOU tell me how many is too many.  I will only offer now that the number is LESS than it was the last time I answered.

As for number two, speaking of the 2a or discussing  the internal workings of the Sporter does not make one an ammoseuxal according to the Google definition you to look up.  So, you will have to give specific threads to make this point