Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

it is the opinion of the Court...

The Court, not some flatulent apian abuser, is the "finder of fact"..

Hence

“Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

In direct response to....

Your turn

Kaplan wrote that the jury's unanimous verdict was almost entirely in favor of Carroll, except that the jury concluded she had failed to prove that Trump raped her "within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law."

The judge said the section requires vaginal penetration by a penis while forcible penetration without consent of the vagina or other bodily orifices by fingers or anything else is labeled "sexual abuse" rather than "rape."

 He said the definition of rape was "far narrower" than how rape is defined in common modern parlance, in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes and elsewhere.

 The judge said the section requires vaginal penetration by a penis while forcible penetration without consent of the vagina or other bodily orifices by fingers or anything else is labeled "sexual abuse" rather than "rape."

Judge upholds the $5 million verdict against Trump in E. Jean Carroll's sex abuse and defamation case | PBS News

UNDER LAWS "elsewhere" Trump MIGHT have been found to have "raped" Carroll, but NOT HERE, ****!! And even then, "elsewhere" is likely to have been a DEFEAT for Carroll since the STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS would have ran out!! Hell, they had to WRITE A SPECIAL LAW for Carroll fo even have a **** case, MORON!!

YOU just keep LOSING worse and worse on every post you make!! Time to learn the REALLY SMART PLAY AND SHUT THE **** UP!!

Chase me some more!! THIS *** kicking is getting REAL fun!!