Today 6:19 am
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ He didn't...
By mutual agreement of the parties the jury was asked to determine whether the preponderance of the evidence supported a criminal DEFINITION, not a charge. Because the jury couldn't "convict", and the Plaintiff did not allege rape.
All of this is clear in Judge Kaplan's opinion.
Why was Judge Kaplan obliged to so opine?
NO RAPE!!
Sucks for you, CUPCAKE!!A notable real-world example of this exact legal dynamic occurred in the 2023 civil trial Carroll v. Trump, where the jury found the defendant liable for sexual abuse under a preponderance of the evidence standard, but not rape, because the specific statutory definition of rape was not proven.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.