Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Huey » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Blackvegetable » 55 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Then shut the **** up.
If voiding the conviction was a declaration of innocence, allowing Grafton to retry him would constitute Double Jeopardy..
**** idiot.
All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction
Let me know when the new trial begins. EPIC thread fail. Just admit the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
You can't do it, can you, without spin and ****. You suffer some serious mental issues.
Blackvegetable » 32 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Huey » 35 minutes ago » wrote: ↑All I know is the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction
Let me know when the new trial begins. EPIC thread fail. Just admit the NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
You can't do it, can you, without spin and ****. You suffer some serious mental issues.
I provide citations...
And Reason.
To correct your uninformed perception isn't "spin"...
I provided citations. NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
Their is no spin, el Douche. You lost. And you are not man enough to admit. That is why you are alone. You do not act like a man and lie.
Tell you what. Prove you are a man and answer one question with a yes or no answer.
Did the NH Supreme Court overturn the verdict, VOIDING the conviction? Yes or no ****?
Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Huey » 16 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
I provided citations. NH Supreme Court overturned the verdict, VOIDING the conviction.
Their is no spin, el Douche.
It doesn't "void" the facts established at trial.
Do you understand this?
The verdict is in. You are not a man who can accept facts. Take your L and move on.
You lose.