Huey » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Blackvegetable » 40 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Huey » 47 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
1. Post the **** source. Because what you cut and pasted into the OP does not match the Daily Beast link.
2. You did not surmise ****. You are repeating what you are told.
3. Contrary to the words in your OP he is not being prosecuted. He is an innocent man. Post the **** sure ******. Isn't that what you called people who do not post their sources?
Yo are **** coward.
1, 2. The link in the OP, of course.
3. Why is he talking to the State Attorney General?
I better see a **** answer.
1. You are liar. The article at the daily beast article DOES NOT MATCH what you cut and paste, as shown, ******.
2. DOn't care until you post the original source, ******.
3. Are you afraid ******, or did you change it yourself?
Blackvegetable » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Huey » 34 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
1. You are liar. The article at the daily beast article DOES NOT MATCH what you cut and paste, as shown, ******.
2. DOn't care until you post the original source, ******.
3. Are you afraid ******, or did you change it yourself?
1. It did when I cut and pasted it....
2. The same **** link.
3. It's digital, you **** idiot...it can be continually updated.
Now answer, Yeastie...
******, what you cut and pasted does not match what is at the link. I figured it out ******:
Updated Sep. 4 2026 4:57PM EDT Published Sep. 4 2026 7:46AM EDT
You posted it BEFORE they corrected the error.
We are done here. There were WRONG with the initial post. They corrected it. So all of your ranting and raving claiming he was being prosecuted is ****, ******.
Now admit he is not being prosecuted.