Johnny » wrote:
Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
The facts are the man is not being prosecuted as we speak. The facts are the conviction was VOIDED by the NH Supreme Court.
You lose ******. You gonna tell us who led you to the daily beast article?
You're like the juror number 12 hold out in the Clancy trial Huey.
It's a beautiful day..
I wish you both could rest your cases..
We should discuss Kushner and Witkoff going to Moscow...
My case is has been put to rest. He was wrong. And he won't shut up. What ****** likes to do is continue to rant and are, to reframe, hoping the other poster says something wrong on his reframe. Then he runs like the ****** he really is from his ****.
Wan't happen here. He should researched further but did not. Particularly when dealing with a source like the Daily Beast.