User avatar
Blackvegetable
Today 1:02 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
57,939 posts
JohnnyYou » 29 minutes ago » wrote: I don't  know who that is or pertinence..
Mr. Rosen.

The perp referenced in the OP.

Upon reversal, the case was remanded back to Grafton.

Because this involves a series of duplicate votes in the name of Mr. Rosen, the State has very good reason to retry, as this evidence is dispositive.

Mr. Rosen faces a considerable "fat tail risk", not only due to the quality of the evidence against him, but as a consequence of the very piece of evidence which caused the Supreme Court to overturn the original verdict.
 
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search