Yesterday 3:42 pm
Huey » 19 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ AI OverviewIn the 1990s, New York State penal law strictly defined rape as vaginal sexual intercourse involving penile penetration committed by force or with a person incapable of consent, while categorizing other nonconsensual forms of penetration or contact under different offenses like "sexual abuse" or "criminal sexual act". [1, 2]
Key Elements of the 1990s Definition
- Penile-Vaginal Requirement: The legal charge of "rape" specifically required contact between the penis and the vagina. Penetration of the vagina or other orifices using fingers, objects, or any body part other than a penis was legally prosecuted under separate statutes (such as sexual abuse or sodomy/criminal sexual acts), rather than rape.
Nope, not according to the instructions he gave the jury and NY State law until recently.
You lose.
See ya tomorrow. I will keep reposting every time you post that crap.
This was a civil procedure...
The finding was irrelevant..
To understand why, run from the following question...
"Had the jury voted yes, would Grifty have gone to jail?"
Another day of running....in sheer terror.