Blackvegetable » 25 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2026, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑
Huey » 04 Sep 2026, 1:37 pm » wrote: ↑
Where did he admit he did it? And he is legally blind. How in the world did he do all of this?
Like I said, the verdict was voided. There is nothing in the news about the trial court retrying the case of negotiating.
You were even asked if you understood it.
“We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted.
Blackvegetable » 04 Sep 2026, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑
Huey » 04 Sep 2026, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑
Hey, *******, you need to spend less time deleting and reading the information provided.
“
His defense lawyer was on the NH supreme court?
This statement, you **** *******.
“We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted
Blackvegetable » 05 Sep 2026, 12:10 pm » wrote: ↑
Huey » 05 Sep 2026, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑
I need a link to something showing that. I can't find anything about a second trial. And why did it take you so long to come up with this?
This is from the tail beast:
Now, the Department of the Interior has awarded a $2.7 million contract to clean the pool to a Massachusetts-based company whose chief executive was once convicted of election fraud, according to
CNN.
No, you don't, Oblivious Little Pile of Dung...
It's the 1st paragraph of the OP...
Acknowledge the fact.
Seeing a lot of questions answered.
We’re not here to dispute the charged conduct or conviction,” Connolly began, saying its seriousness was accepted.
That is not an admission. Ad do you have that date when the prosecution started? Right nnow he is an innocent man. I know you hanging on, spinning facts, but accept theft you are wrong.