Today 6:50 am
I have explained this several times..Huey » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ One time and one time only. Jeez, you are **** retarded. They are relevant because they settled a liable case for claiming Trump was civilly liable for rape for 16 million dollars. A guest on a show went down the same road and the host corrected him to spare the network a lawsuit.
Now it is your turn to explain why it is not relevant. Acknowledge you were answered.
What Stephanopoulos said is TECHNICALLY false.
Had he said
"...found liable for an act defined as rape. The term used to describe someone who commits such an act is "Rapist"."
There would have been no issue.
As it was, it isn't at all clear whether Grifty would have met the requirements for a defamation or libel claim.
For reasons you don't have the essentials to comprehend.
Were I you, I'd hide out at the other place for a while..
****'s about to get ugly at the Rosen thread...