Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
I have explained this several times..
What Stephanopoulos said is TECHNICALLY false.
Had he said
"...found liable for an act defined as rape. The term used to describe someone who commits such an act is "Rapist"."
There would have been no issue.
As it was, it isn't at all clear whether Grifty would have met the requirements for a defamation or libel claim.
For reasons you don't have the essentials to comprehend.
Were I you, I'd hide out at the other place for a while..
****'s about to get ugly at the Rosen thread...
He was found liable for sexual assualt, NOT RAPE, according to the Jury and NY STATE LAW.
It didn't get ugly for me on the Rosen thread. YOU have nothing but speculation.
Additionally, whenever you start a SECOND THREAD on a topic already under discussion it is a sign you are getting your *** beat and you wish to reframe.