9 Sep 2026 7:10 am
He was found liable for a SPECIFIC ACT of sexual assault.Huey » 09 Sep 2026, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ He was found liable for sexual assualt,
It didn't get ugly for me on the Rosen thread. YOU have nothing but speculation.
Additionally, whenever you start a SECOND THREAD on a topic already under discussion it is a sign you are getting your *** beat and you wish to reframe.
Unless you read the opinion, you must shut the **** up.
Tiny,It didn't get ugly for me on the Rosen thread. YOU have nothing but speculation.
I'm the one with the citations and facts.
And I have nailed every element of it...
But now it will get Unspeakably Cruel.
With receipts..
May call for a dedicated thread..
Another day, another humiliating context.