Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
That's ****...
This is why it has to be my way...
You lie about everything, words don't mean what they say, and you will not acknowledge objective fact...
It's like debating really stupid moss...
I accept your surrender, bitch.
You have yet to debate, my bitch. Start posting these objective facts and I will do as I say. Bitch, youu are surprised I said I would. You had no intention of doing it, my bitch. Post them or STFU.
Here are some objective facts for you to acknowledge, Bitch:
- No Specifics: The memo did not name specific targets, attack dates, or flight numbers.
- No Mention of Weapons: It did not warn that commercial airplanes would be used as guided missiles.
- Historical Context: Officials later testified that much of the intelligence cited was generalized, strategic, or based on older reporting from the late 1990s rather than a clear blueprint for an imminent domestic operation.