Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 13 Sep 2026, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 10:46 am

Huey » 13 Sep 2026, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

13 Sep 2026, 10:38 am

You are not very smart, Senior Citizen.

Sometimes your talking points are word for word to theirs.  It is incredible. And Mary, I not saying you go to that forum, moron.  I am saying you get your points from the same place that they do.

You are not very smart, Senior Citizen.

This is gonna be choice... 

Sometimes your talking points are word for word to theirs.  

 Given your lack of integrity, how might we confirm this?

It is incredible.

To someone who gets everything they think they know from The Five.

 I not saying you go to that forum, moron.  I am saying you get your points from the same place that they do.

Like

NYT

WaPo

Bloomberg 

Daily Beast

ABC

?


Yes...there is a relatively finite, and fixed, number of sources...but still a healthy number and variety.

You immerse yourself in a universe of 2....linked at the hip....recatapulting the same ****, in easily digestible slogany things.

Which is why you refuse to acknowledge Objective Facts.
 

 

Corbett’s instincts were justified. The Times’ story was a bad misfire—one that resulted in the paper’s first defamation trial loss in a United States court in more than fifty years. When the trial ended last month, in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, a jury awarded 9.25 million dollars to a former University of Alabama basketball player named Kai Spears, because the Times had mistakenly placed him as a passenger in a car that was at the scene of a tragic shooting death.

https://www.cjr.org/news/how-the-new-yo ... spears.php

The award was reduced but they still lost.