Blackvegetable » Today, 8:00 am » wrote: ↑
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’...Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Tell the board what arcana in jew york law allows an orange *** to stick his dick in a woman - "as many people commonly undertsand the word 'rape'" - and still be found innocent of rape by a jury that agrees he did that.
I don't think you can explain that. I think you're just being jewy - niggling, with a side of bluffloud.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?