Today 11:50 am
It is the probability that you have no clue what he is talking. You are calling the AF source I posted, the lawyer, a liar.Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ It is not about what you want.
It's about the probability that you know more than an active duty officer executing a task to which he was assigned.
It is small enough to warrant favoring the known facts.
And you refuse to post what definition of Line of Duty you are using. I already post. I posted known facts. Some from your own source, and more from the AF website.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152