Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
1980 Webster's definition of w0man and female
I know.Huey » 28 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I have never given a **** about any of that, with the exceptions I posted.
And I am making an argument that you should.
Did you consider my argument? Do you consider it in error?
We would not have this **** going on if we had kept our foot on their necks. Taking our boot off their necks is DIRECTLY related to the current state of affairs. Your post suggests that they can be bargained with. That we can agree that they get to show their entire *** but they cannot spread their cheeks while aiming it at us. How has that with been working out?
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?