Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
1980 Webster's definition of w0man and female
57 minutes ago
I do not for one minute believe we can put that genie back in the bottle. But we CAN speak truly. Indeed, having the courage and dignity to speak truth is where the change will start.DeezerShoove » Today, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑ The trouble with a completely hardline stance is that it assumes we can "go back".
I cannot see a way that will ever happen. The societal wound will have left permanent scars.
The best we can hope for is what you alluded to in the previous post: Get them some **** humility.
Ban parades, openly being proud of sodomy, grooming, etc.
I'd settle for that at this point.
Not being EXPECTED to accept the *** **** for fear of being (dare I say it) a bigot.
There are many gays that want this **** to die down too. I admit to being on their side at some level.
They may be the minority within the minority though.
But between here and sanity, there's a blood bath.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?