Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

23 minutes ago

Huey » 41 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

41 minutes ago

See, I told you that you could figure that out on your own.  Even if it is from that less than credible source, the daily beast.  Zero, huh?  You shoulda used the link I gave you, Princess.

For the record, they **** you again.  This is from yesterday:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... ions-mount

You need to find better sources.

See, I told you that you could figure that out on your own.

When you ran...of course..

Even if it is from that less than credible source, the daily beast

Except that you've never laid a glove in it and they're quoting the guy, verbatim. 

Zero, huh?  You shoulda used the link I gave you, Princess.

you're a **** idiot.

For the record, they **** you again.  This is from yesterday:

when did the WSJ break the story?

 

When you ran...of course..

I didn't run.  I gave you the tools necessary to get your answer.  Not my fault you are too lazy to your own work, Princess.  I don't do YOUR bidding.

FOX news online, that your source lied to you about and said had 0 reporting online, actually ran the story I posted about YESTERDAY.  The daily beast story was published TODAY!

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-veter ... -guilfoyle

Fox Veteran Shames Network for ‘Malpractice’ Over Guilfoyle

“Fox has 0 reporting online about this,” he wrote on X, saying the network’s last article mentioning Guilfoyle dated Dec. 10, 2024, when Trump announced her nomination.

They **** you again.

And, Spoiled Princess, if you click on the link I gave from the WSJ, you will get the date the story ran. Again, I gave you the tools.