Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

My work here is done until you come up with some kind of counter argument.  I have given you the tools that answer your questions, Princess.

You don't have an argument. 


You are running from the evidence which makes mine.

You refuse to acknowledge the objective facts because you're a coward. 

Everyone can see this.

 

 

My argument has been standing untouched all day while you've been busy pivoting, editing posts, and declaring victory. Take all the time you need to catch up.

Questions you have the answer to is not an argument.

Huey » Yesterday, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 3:19 pm

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 2:47 pm

https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-veter ... -guilfoyle

Fox Veteran Shames Network for ‘Malpractice’ Over Guilfoyle

“Fox has 0 reporting online about this,” he wrote on X, saying the network’s last article mentioning Guilfoyle dated Dec. 10, 2024, when Trump announced her nomination. 

The veteran executive praised Fox’s sister publication, the Wall Street Journal, for exposing a series of allegations against Guilfoyle, including claims she solicited via text messages $100,000 from MAGA donor Eric Deters with no paper trail to pay off an American Express bill.

For a sense of scale...

Her MONTHLY AMEX bill is 2x Hunter's alleged retainer from.Burisma.

The emails make EXPLICIT references to "Pay to Play".

So why would FOX not report on its "sister publication's scoop?
 
 


 

See, I told you that you could figure that out on your own.  Even if it is from that less than credible source, the daily beast.  Zero, huh?  You shoulda used the link I gave you, Princess.

For the record, they **** you again.  This is from yesterday:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... ions-mount

You need to find better sources.