Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑What IS your "argument"?Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ My argument has been standing untouched all day while you've been busy pivoting, editing posts, and declaring victory. Take all the time you need to catch up.
Questions you have the answer to is not an argument.
Read the whole thing this time. The important parts are in bold.Huey » Yesterday, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑See, I told you that you could figure that out on your own. Even if it is from that less than credible source, the daily beast. Zero, huh? You shoulda used the link I gave you, Princess.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑ https://www.thedailybeast.com/fox-veter ... -guilfoyle
Fox Veteran Shames Network for ‘Malpractice’ Over Guilfoyle
“Fox has 0 reporting online about this,” he wrote on X, saying the network’s last article mentioning Guilfoyle dated Dec. 10, 2024, when Trump announced her nomination.
The veteran executive praised Fox’s sister publication, the Wall Street Journal, for exposing a series of allegations against Guilfoyle, including claims she solicited via text messages $100,000 from MAGA donor Eric Deters with no paper trail to pay off an American Express bill.
For a sense of scale...
Her MONTHLY AMEX bill is 2x Hunter's alleged retainer from.Burisma.
The emails make EXPLICIT references to "Pay to Play".
So why would FOX not report on its "sister publication's scoop?
For the record, they **** you again. This is from yesterday:
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump- ... ions-mount
You need to find better sources.