User avatar
RebelGator
22 Oct 2026 6:01 am
User avatar
      
11,748 posts
RebelGator » Yesterday, 5:55 am » wrote: ↑ Minnesota House of Representatives: Passed 70 to 61.
Democrats (DFL): 70 voted Yes / 0 voted No.
Republicans: 0 voted Yes / 61 voted No.

Minnesota State Senate: Passed 34 to 33.
Democrats (DFL): 34 voted Yes / 0 voted No 
Republicans: 0 voted Yes / 33 voted No.

You're probably wondering exactly what was voted on that caused such a stark divide between the parties....well, I'm going to inform you.

The bill provided funding for the insertion of drugs thru the rectum......that's right you read it correctly,  The Rectum.
Johnny can probably tell you more about Booty Huffing than I can, I'm just here to report the difference between a Democrat and a Republican by the way they vote.
Make your voting decision, if your an Independent
.....who do you want to associate with?
 
The key details regarding how this funding was approved include:
The Funding Source: The Minnesota administration under Governor Tim Walz and Lt. Governor Peggy Flanagan spearheaded a $100 million grant program aimed at assisting "Minnesotans facing homelessness".
Executive Allocation: From this broader fund, state contracts and grants—totaling millions of dollars—were distributed by executive agencies to various community organizations, including a Minneapolis-based nonprofit called Southside Harm Reduction Services. 
The Controversy: It was discovered that Southside Harm Reduction Services used part of its taxpayer-funded budget to supply harm reduction materials, which included "booty bumping" (or "boofing") kits alongside standard safety supplies. 
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search