Neo » 03 Jul 2022, 2:21 pm » wrote: ↑
We base our understanding and grant recognition of rights to fellow human beings as persons created in the image of God. Inalienable rights granted by the creator. Without that recognition do people have Inalienable rights? Is there an agnostic reason competing humans have to respect one another?
I brought this up when citizens united gave ersatz human rights to corporations. My argument was that rights come from God, and that a discrete number of rights exist on the earth at any given moment. That number can be expressed in a simple equation:
The number of rights God grants human beings, times the number of human beings.
That^, my argument reasoned, is the number of rights on the planet at any moment in time. The only way to give corporations rights, therefore, is to first take those rights from humans.
I stand by that argument. Most of the board's rat wingers argued against me. Not gonna name any names, because I don't know
@Huey's name. The arguments he made against me were just EMBARRASING. Lucky for him, they are gone with the wind.
Clem, of course, likewise pandered for wall street.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?