Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:52 am

Huey » Yesterday, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 10:50 am

LMAO!  Tell us, in your own words, 

Did you watch the video?

 

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:13 am

Huey » Yesterday, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:04 am

To treat your thread exactly the same way you 

Coward, ffs...


Are these your words?

I don't see any thoughts of your own in the OP. What do you want to discuss?

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 12:17 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 12:17 pm

Huey » Yesterday, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 11:45 am

Ok, your thread title is about the definition of "women", you posted a graph about non citizen voting  convictions, and you want us to go to 4:55 where you have a partial segment of the 5 with no context.

So what the **** is it you want to talk about?

Ok, your thread title is about the definition of "women", 

Houston!!!!

Right out of the gate.

A slogan....with which you must be familiar...

you posted a graph about non citizen voting  convictions,

Containing data which illustrates the fraudulent nature of another slogan....with which you must be familiar.

and you want us to go to 4:55 where you have a partial segment of the 5 with no context.

one guy, with whom a little imbecile like you would stand eye to eye, who favors boat shoes he buys at children's departments, yucking it up with a closeted dimwit, in the service of a catamite prone to waxing ecstatic over men's asses.....

In an effort to sow doubt about a reporter who asked The Rapist Felon a perfectly reasonable question. 

Do you see how these items might, in the aggregate, answer the question asked in the title?