User avatar
Huey
4 Jul 2022 1:01 pm
User avatar
      
37,293 posts
Blackvegetable » 04 Jul 2022, 11:02 am » wrote: ↑ My argument is that it is not a design optimized for assault. The ordinance compliments its purpose.

To further show that it is indeed a "different weapon" post the respective US sales volumes.
Come on BV why makes it “not a design optimized for assault”?and to post sales umbers which have NOTHING to do with design you will have to tell me which company that manufactures an AR style rifle.  And which model.  
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search