Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
59,315 posts
Huey » 04 Jul 2022, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑
1. You did not ask a question. You made a demand and it is a diversion.
2. I told I am conceding the point you were driving at on volume.
3. Volume has nothing to do with your argument:
My argument is that it is not a design optimized for assault. The ordinance compliments its purpose.
Come on BV what makes it “not a design optimized for assault”?
Answer the question, ******.
You have a lot to yap about "lying" "answering questions" and "cowardice".