Liberal Forum

Huey » 04 Jul 2022, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Jul 2022, 3:27 pm

The only reason is it is called a battle rifle is because it is a fully powered cartridge.  It is stronger and does more damage than an intermediate powered cartridge.

A battle rifle is a service rifle chambered to fire a fully powered cartridge.[1] The term "battle rifle" is a retronym created largely out of a need to better differentiate the intermediate-powered assault rifles (e.g. the StG-44, AK-47, M16, AUG) from full-powered rifles 

This argument is **** hilarious,

Because, you stupid ****, the fully powered cartridge wasn't consistent with the change in Doctrine that obliged the introduction of the M16.

Had you read the ORIGINAL citation on the development of the Assault Rifle, we wouldn't be having this debate.

Hell, if you could only recall what YOUR OWN citation on the .222 told you about it.

But you can't **** read.