12 Jul 2022 11:26 pm
We really reached a high point of ridiculousness when a Supreme Court Nominee COULD HAVE EASILY DEFINED WHAT A WOMAN IS BUT CHOSE NOT TO for fear of having her home burned down or shot in the back of the head by some "PROGRESSIVE / AMERICA HATING LIBERAL FASCIST POS".Cannonpointer » 12 Jul 2022, 11:02 pm » wrote: ↑ And not fer nuthin? Women's representation in corporate board rooms and in the work force in general is NOT at an all time low, as the queer prevaricates. It's quite the opposite.
But never mind THAT - the *** cannot define woman, much less actually support women. How can a person support a thing, if they don't know what the thing they are supporting is?
"DURING TIMES OF UNIVERSAL DECEIT....TELLING THE TRUTH BECOMES A REVOLUTIONARY ACT"