What does this mean?Blackvegetable » 11 Jan 2026, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑That is not a capital offense, a crime or even a threat.
Depends on what you believe this meansHuey » 11 Jan 2026, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑
What does this mean?
That is not a capital offense, a crime or even a threat.
Blackvegetable » 11 Jan 2026, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑Depends on what you believe this meansHuey » 11 Jan 2026, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑
What does this mean?
That is not a capital offense, a crime or even a threat.
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’
Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
BV says some stupid ****. You know that. If it can be spun into a victim-oriented narrative, then he is all over it.Huey » 11 Jan 2026, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑
What does this mean?
That is not a capital offense, a crime or even a threat.
On the other forun his butt buddy Tavy is claiming she was like Jesus because she was not complying with the agents. They are some stupid people.Vegas » 11 Jan 2026, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑BV says some stupid ****. You know that. If it can be spun into a victim-oriented narrative, then he is all over it.Huey » 11 Jan 2026, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑
What does this mean?
That is not a capital offense, a crime or even a threat.
You can't accuse victims with a capital offense, crime, or as a threatening person. Therefore, he portrays her as a victim. In BV's mind, that is perfectly reasonable.,
Huey » 11 Jan 2026, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑ On the other forun his butt buddy Tavy is claiming she was like Jesus because she was comlhying with the agents. They are some stupid people.
CP believes the same thing!Huey » 11 Jan 2026, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ wrong thread.
On this thread I have a complete quote from you that shows you think it is legal in MN to park perpendicular to the right away to attempt to impede Law Enforcement from doing their job. I'll fix it for you.
That is not a capital offense, a crime or even a threat.
Yea..
Blackvegetable » 11 Jan 2026, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑Yea..
You pulling that **** only differs from what you call "editing" in that you do it when your skull is bouncing off the curb....
1. It means it is no a capital offense.That is not a capital offense, a crime or even a threat.
Ok.. so your diaper is full of shyt..
Aren't both faith and beliefs centered around ideas life isn't self evident time adapting as personally alive by heart beats existing here in series parallel events as a whole species populating space by ancestral lineages and generation gaps here now, one at a time regardless time and temperate zone currently inhabiting space this rotation of the planet?.Blackvegetable » 11 Jan 2026, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Depends on what you believe this means
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’
Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
We'll do it your way.Huey » 11 Jan 2026, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ And another edited post.
What does this mean:
1. It means it is no a capital offense.
2. It means in the context of the quote you replied to you believe IT IS NOT A CRIME.
3. It means it was not a threat.
Blackvegetable » 11 Jan 2026, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑We'll do it your way.Huey » 11 Jan 2026, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑ And another edited post.
What does this mean:
1. It means it is no a capital offense.
2. It means in the context of the quote you replied to you believe IT IS NOT A CRIME.
3. It means it was not a threat.
"Irrelevant".
"Nah."
"Start a thread?"
Proof of rape is video, DNA and unbiased eye witnesses.Blackvegetable » 11 Jan 2026, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Depends on what you believe this means
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’
Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Have an R.E.M. Orange Crush Nazi..*GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Jan 2026, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Proof of rape is video, DNA and unbiased eye witnesses.
If you were found guilty of rape with anything less you would be screaming bloody murder.
I have disputed objective fact. Your welcome for the english lesson.
Blackvegetable » 11 Jan 2026, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Depends on what you believe this means
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’
Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
