Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 10:53 am

no..

You surrendered 

On your own thread.

Again.
 

 

Anytime you are willing to explain your comment go for it.   

Huey » 12 Jan 2026, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 10:53 am

Anytime you are willing to explain your comment go for it.

I tried.

Trump is your President Blackvegetable for 3 more years it’s gonna be great!

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 10:54 am

I tried.

try again 
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 10:54 am

I tried.

 

No, you didn't.  Trying to explain what you meant by asking questions on an unrelated topic you already know my answer is not trying.  

Huey » 12 Jan 2026, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 11:00 am

No, you didn't.  Trying to explain what you meant by asking questions on an unrelated topic you already know my answer is not trying.

Tiny,

If you ask me to explain it, I'm going to do it my way. Your way has never done anyone any good.

You can't controlly my explanation. 





 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 11:03 am

Tiny,

If you ask me to explain it, I'm going to do it my way. Your way has never done anyone any good.

You can't controlly my explanation.

I’d at first you don’t succeed try try again 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 11:03 am

Tiny,

If you ask me to explain it, I'm going to do it my way. Your way has never done anyone any good.

You can't controlly my explanation. 





 

 

If you can't explain yourself in your own words I have to go with the fact you think it is legal in MN to impede federal agents by parking your car perpendicular to the right of way. 

 

Huey » 12 Jan 2026, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 11:06 am

If you can't explain yourself in your own words 

No, no, no...

You can't dictate the terms under which something will be explained to you.

 

BuckNaked » 12 Jan 2026, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 11:06 am

I’d at first you don’t succeed try try again

try again. 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 10:10 am

Something along the lines of

“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’  

Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

?

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap ... .212.0.pdf

your referencing the judge's post verdict opinion...

try again...
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 10:02 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 10:02 am

JuCo,

You're a **** idiot.

Alles klar?

and yet you don't refute it...

alles ist klar...
 

DeezerShoove » 11 Jan 2026, 11:28 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2026, 11:28 pm

Unless the driver is using their vehicle for "other than traffic" reasons.
Attempted manslaughter probably is frowned on. 

ACTUAL maslaughter is frowned on, too. Or used to be.

Many of the people cheering it now were lamenting it when Babbit was manslaughtered by the state. 
 

Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2026, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 12:08 pm

ACTUAL maslaughter is frowned on, too. Or used to be.

Many of the people cheering it now were lamenting it when Babbit was manslaughtered by the state.

I must be a sociopath... I don't much give a **** about either.
In both cases, people placed themselves in the known risky situations.

risk:

1. The possibility of suffering harm or loss; danger. 
2. A factor, thing, element, or course involving uncertain danger; a hazard.

By definition, I am off the hook regarding required amounts of empathy.
These are things I am smart enough to weigh when choosing mountain climbing, sky diving, fentanyl, etc.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 11:20 am

Huey » 12 Jan 2026, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 11:06 am

If you can't explain yourself in your own words 

No, no, no...

You can't dictate the terms under which something will be explained to you.

 

 

BV be like:

Huey » 12 Jan 2026, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 12:28 pm

BV be like:


 

No...you be like that...

There's no reason to do it your way...but you insist.

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 12:30 pm

No...you be like that...

There's no reason to do it your way...but you insist.

It is not up to me to explain what you mean.  Why you afraid, Wee Little One? Although you were quite clear in claiming impeding federals and ramming them with you car is not a crime in MN.

ROG62 » 12 Jan 2026, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 10:04 am

that would be a rape of the hand, which would be thrown out of court immediately because of the obvious consenuality...

CP don't feed my troll.  He's a power freak...

DeezerShoove » 12 Jan 2026, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 12:26 pm

I must be a sociopath... I don't much give a **** about either.

I'm not losing sleep. I'm just arguing the issue, looking for decent refutations.

DeezerShoove » 12 Jan 2026, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 12:26 pm

In both cases, people placed themselves in the known risky situations.

risk:

1. The possibility of suffering harm or loss; danger. 
2. A factor, thing, element, or course involving uncertain danger; a hazard.

Yup.

DeezerShoove » 12 Jan 2026, 12:26 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 12:26 pm

By definition, I am off the hook regarding required amounts of empathy.

Me, too. I give two ****. But I take note of the precedents.
Letting citizens be gunned by the state without robust post mortems is the action of an idiotic populace that is highly desirous of having its rights trampled.

Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2026, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 12:36 pm

I'm not losing sleep. I'm just arguing the issue, looking for decent refutations.

Yup.

Me, too. I give two ****. But I take note of the precedents.
Letting citizens be gunned by the state without robust post mortems is the action of an idiotic populace that is highly desirous of having its rights trampled.

That seems a fair interpretation.

Trump has the World Flying Higher than Ozzie Osbourne ever was...  We are closer to state sponsored wipe outs than ever before. People are going to be jumping out hotel windows soon.. I sure think Virginia Guifre's suicide is suspect.

I am willing to bet I am on Krispy's shoot the dog list.