Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 1:40 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 1:40 pm

of course not

You're continuing to assert dumb **** handed to you by an Administration celebrated for its indifference to Truth

And you're demanding that I translate words in plain English. even though you've displayed a consistent indifference to their meaning.

All I am saying you think impeding federal agents from doing their job is not a crime.


 

RebelGator » 12 Jan 2026, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 7:42 am

Did he leave his ring or watch in there.....maybe a phone?

You seem to have special knowledge about E. Jean's beaver....put your ear down there while I call the President....that would be evidence. All you have is ****.

Imagine if we apply the same standards of zero proof and hearsay evidence to 20 MILLION ILLEGAL **** ALIEN DEPORTATIONS...!!!      
 

Huey » 12 Jan 2026, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 1:53 pm

All I am saying you think impeding federal agents from doing their job is not a crime.

Their mandate may be far too broad to assert so.

Furthermore, she can't be charged posthumously. 

The issue before the courts won't be her guilt, but his.

The propaganda must change that reality for those susceptible to it.

And you're doing your part.

Huey » 12 Jan 2026, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 12:45 pm

Cannonpointer » 11 Jan 2026, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2026, 9:18 pm

DeezerShoove » 11 Jan 2026, 7:05 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2026, 7:05 pm

Apparently so...

Search Assist
Yes, ICE officers, like other federal employees, are required to take an oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. This oath is part of their commitment to uphold the laws and duties of their position.    Cornell University Al Jazeera

Which do not include traffic laws.

The mandate for ICE is very limited.

It is very limited:

What powers do ICE agents have to arrest people?​

Its agents have the power to stop, detain and arrest people they suspect of being in the US illegally. They can detain US citizens in limited circumstances, such as if a person interferes with an arrest, assaults an officer, or ICE suspect the person of being in the US illegally.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp80ljjd5rwo

I would say hitting an ICE agent with a car is an assault
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 2:13 pm

Huey » 12 Jan 2026, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 1:53 pm

All I am saying you think impeding federal agents from doing their job is not a crime.

Their mandate may be far too broad to assert so.

Furthermore, she can't be charged posthumously. 

The issue before the courts won't be her guilt, but his.

The propaganda must change that reality for those susceptible to it.

And you're doing your part.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 2:13 pm

Huey » 12 Jan 2026, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 1:53 pm

All I am saying you think impeding federal agents from doing their job is not a crime.

Their mandate may be far too broad to assert so.

Furthermore, she can't be charged posthumously. 

The issue before the courts won't be her guilt, but his.

The propaganda must change that reality for those susceptible to it.

And you're doing your part.

AI Overview

Yes, it is a federal crime to physically impede, obstruct, or interfere with an 
ICE officer's duties, including arrests, and can lead to serious federal charges for anyone, including U.S. citizens. While bystanders can alert others or record events from a safe distance, physically intervening, getting too close, or refusing reasonable orders to move can result in arrest for obstruction of a federal officer or similar charges. 
What constitutes interference:

• Physical Obstruction: Blocking an officer's path, touching them, or preventing them from reaching someone.
• Refusing Orders: Not backing up when given a reasonable order to do so.
• Providing False Information: Misleading enforcement efforts.
• Encouraging Interference: Urging others to obstruct an arrest is also risky and illegal

 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 2:13 pm

Their mandate may be far too broad to assert so.

Furthermore, she can't be charged posthumously. 

The issue before the courts won't be her guilt, but his.

The propaganda must change that reality for those susceptible to it.

And you're doing your part.

The Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator!

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 2:13 pm

Their mandate may be far too broad to assert so.

Furthermore, she can't be charged posthumously. 

The issue before the courts won't be her guilt, but his.

The propaganda must change that reality for those susceptible to it.

And you're doing your part.

No answer did you expect anything else?

JohnnyYou » 12 Jan 2026, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 12:49 pm

Well,  it could have been the trolling.  There still is no moral justification, and possibly legal injustification for Good's killing.

Even CP is on board when the state starts killing citizens the shyt is gonna hit the fan.  It may the last fan Trump has.

There's nothing moral in taking a life...that's not at issue...

​@Cannon Pointer  is obviously a kneegrow who grew up in Alabama in the 60's and got slapped around all the time by local cops...  
 
 

JohnnyYou » 12 Jan 2026, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 12:47 pm

I thought Jesus was crucified?

we're talking goerge floyd..
 

JohnnyYou » 12 Jan 2026, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 12:46 pm

The white noise people are the problem..  The doom azzes don't understand they aren't even 10% of the folks on the spaceship.

Those are your constituents....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iRDDEUNoz38

murdock » 12 Jan 2026, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 8:21 pm

youtube /watch?v=iRDDEUNoz38

CP and his canary shoove azz don't give a phook


youtu.be/c5BL4RNFr58?si=jRWJNqptXYuTTrE6

you might need to add the HH tits pass

BuckNaked » 12 Jan 2026, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 3:31 pm

No answer did you expect anything else?

Are you in an answering mood?

Huey » 12 Jan 2026, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 1:52 pm

Oh. Are you saying it is only assault if you get an injury?  No, no bones were broken.

No, I'm saying it's not an assault just because someone kills you.

Did the SUV hit someone? In the way that, oh, say, a bullet hit someone?

Or was it just an "assault" because we need to explain away the killing of a citizen?

YOU called it an assault. Got milk? Or maybe some evidence?

I do. I got a **** corpse. Wutchugot? A disputed claim that serves the killer?
 
 

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2026, 9:02 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 9:02 pm

Are you in an answering mood?

I’ll answer but I wasn’t axed 

Cannonpointer » 12 Jan 2026, 10:33 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2026, 10:33 pm

No, I'm saying it's not an assault just because someone kills you.

Did the SUV hit someone? In the way that, oh, say, a bullet hit someone?

Or was it just an "assault" because we need to explain away the killing of a citizen?

YOU called it an assault. Got milk? Or maybe some evidence?

I do. I got a **** corpse. Wutchugot? A disputed claim that serves the killer?

Got evidence?  Oh, just videos and eye witness accounts. 

WTF?  What has this country come to when people come with excuses for this stuff?

BuckNaked » 13 Jan 2026, 12:56 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 12:56 am

I’ll answer but I wasn’t axed

Inside Trump’s circle, the power of illegal immigration to manipulate popular sentiment was readily apparent, and his advisers brainstormed methods for keeping their attention-addled boss on message. They needed a trick, a mnemonic device.

For whom was the mnemonic device deemed necessary and why?

*GHETTOBLASTER » 11 Jan 2026, 3:57 pm » wrote: ↑

11 Jan 2026, 3:57 pm

Proof of rape is video, DNA  and  unbiased eye witnesses.
If you were found guilty of rape with anything less you would be screaming bloody murder.

Can you work the word.... sodomy, in there.....that's one of BV's favorites. 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2026, 7:49 am

Inside Trump’s circle, the power of illegal immigration to manipulate popular sentiment was readily apparent, and his advisers brainstormed methods for keeping their attention-addled boss on message. They needed a trick, a mnemonic device.

For whom was the mnemonic device deemed necessary and why?

His advisers because they needed a trick to keep their boss on message