Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Ladies & Gentlemen!
Ladies & Gentlemen!
By Blackvegetable
13 Jan 2026 7:54 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
13 Jan 2026 7:54 am
Jeanine Pirro Is Going After Powell, Heedless of Backlash
She has no professional reputation to lose...
https://youtu.be/tMlKmELIhgY?si=X2ng-G5gnTQVIdhC
She has no professional reputation to lose...
https://youtu.be/tMlKmELIhgY?si=X2ng-G5gnTQVIdhC
13 Jan 2026 8:40 am
13 Jan 2026 10:49 am
"The United States Attorney’s Office contacted the Federal Reserve on multiple occasions to discuss cost overruns and the chairman’s congressional testimony, but were ignored, necessitating the use of legal process—which is not a threat,” Pirro wrote in a post on the social platform X.
Seems like a reasonable request, why ignore it?
Seems like a reasonable request, why ignore it?
13 Jan 2026 11:00 am
Deal:Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ Jeanine Pirro Is Going After Powell, Heedless of Backlash
She has no professional reputation to lose...
https://youtu.be/tMlKmELIhgY?si=X2ng-G5gnTQVIdhC
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
13 Jan 2026 11:02 am
:rofl:Fuelman » 13 Jan 2026, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ "The United States Attorney’s Office contacted the Federal Reserve on multiple occasions to discuss cost overruns and the chairman’s congressional testimony, but were ignored, necessitating the use of legal process—which is not a threat,” Pirro wrote in a post on the social platform X.
Seems like a reasonable request, why ignore it?
"to discuss cost overruns"?
WTF does The Chairman have to do with that?
Seems like a reasonable request, why ignore it?
It might be, if directed at the appropriate parties, and free of political taint.
At this point, Grafty has clearly exhausted the benefit of that doubt.
But since you put it that way...
Were you at all bothered by the fact that Jordan, Meadows and Grafty ALL declined to comply with subpoenas?
13 Jan 2026 11:04 am
Letitia somethingFuelman » 13 Jan 2026, 11:49 am » wrote: ↑ "The United States Attorney’s Office contacted the Federal Reserve on multiple occasions to discuss cost overruns and the chairman’s congressional testimony, but were ignored, necessitating the use of legal process—which is not a threat,” Pirro wrote in a post on the social platform X.
Seems like a reasonable request, why ignore it?
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
13 Jan 2026 11:40 am
"The Chairman" is the one who made statements on cost over runs before Congress.Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 12:02 pm » wrote: ↑
"to discuss cost overruns"?
WTF does The Chairman have to do with that?
The receipts should match his testimony.
But then again Powell is not an economist, maybe the numbers thingy is a little over his head. Leave it to Trump to put in someone unqualified!
13 Jan 2026 11:49 am
Fuelman » 13 Jan 2026, 12:40 pm » wrote: ↑ "The Chairman" is the one who made statements on cost over runs before Congress.
The receipts should match his testimony.
But then again Powell is not an economist, maybe the numbers thingy is a little over his head. Leave it to Trump to put in someone unqualified!
And if they don't?The receipts should match his testimony.
We'll revisit this after you answer the question you dodged.
Between 1990 and 1993, Powell worked in the United States Department of the Treasury, at which time Nicholas F. Brady, the former chairman of Dillon, Read & Co., was the United States Secretary of the Treasury. In 1992, Powell became the Under Secretary of the Treasury for Domestic Finance after being nominated by George H. W. Bush.[19][21][18] During his stint at the Treasury, Powell oversaw the investigation and sanctioning of Salomon Brothers after one of its traders submitted false bids for a United States Treasury security.[22] Powell was also involved in the negotiations that made Warren Buffett the chairman of Salomon Brothers.[23]But then again Powell is not an economist,
Between 2010 and 2012, Powell was a visiting scholar at the Bipartisan Policy Center, a think tank in Washington, D.C., where he worked on getting Congress to raise the United States debt ceiling during the United States debt-ceiling crisis of 2011. Powell presented the implications to the economy and interest rates of a default or a delay in raising the debt ceiling.[26] He worked for a salary of $1 per year.[28]
I'd say he can pull rank on any of the **** nipping at his ankles...
I don't know how you'd know or why it would bother you.maybe the numbers thingy is a little over his head
13 Jan 2026 11:52 am
Deal:Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑
And if they don't?
We'll revisit this after you answer the question you dodged.
Between 1990 and 1993, Powell worked in the United States Department of the Treasury, at which time Nicholas F. Brady, the former chairman of Dillon, Read & Co., was the United States Secretary of the Treasury. In 1992, Powell became the Under Secretary of the Treasury for Domestic Finance after being nominated by George H. W. Bush.[19][21][18] During his stint at the Treasury, Powell oversaw the investigation and sanctioning of Salomon Brothers after one of its traders submitted false bids for a United States Treasury security.[22] Powell was also involved in the negotiations that made Warren Buffett the chairman of Salomon Brothers.[23]
Between 2010 and 2012, Powell was a visiting scholar at the Bipartisan Policy Center, a think tank in Washington, D.C., where he worked on getting Congress to raise the United States debt ceiling during the United States debt-ceiling crisis of 2011. Powell presented the implications to the economy and interest rates of a default or a delay in raising the debt ceiling.[26] He worked for a salary of $1 per year.[28]
I'd say he can pull rank on any of the **** nipping at his ankles...
I don't know how you'd know or why it would bother you.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
13 Jan 2026 12:33 pm
Send in the new Fraud arm of the DOJ.
Oh, and thanks for confirming that Powell isn't a economist.
13 Jan 2026 12:48 pm
They will do, not what the facts warrant, but what they're told.Fuelman » 13 Jan 2026, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ Send in the new Fraud arm of the DOJ.
Oh, and thanks for confirming that Powell isn't a economist.
When do you plan to address the necessary questions your comments raise?
13 Jan 2026 12:52 pm
Hopefully he will evade it as many times as you evaded this one:Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑
When do you plan to address the necessary questions your comments raise?
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
13 Jan 2026 1:25 pm
Now THIS is EvasionVegas » 13 Jan 2026, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Hopefully he will evade it as many times as you evaded this one:
viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697
3 years!
13 Jan 2026 1:28 pm
**** you ya traitor *** bastard.Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ Jeanine Pirro Is Going After Powell, Heedless of Backlash
She has no professional reputation to lose...
https://youtu.be/tMlKmELIhgY?si=X2ng-G5gnTQVIdhC
13 Jan 2026 2:14 pm
Lawfare? Quite possible, not that it's hasn't been happening for some time now.Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 1:48 pm » wrote: ↑ They will do, not what the facts warrant, but what they're told.
When do you plan to address the necessary questions your comments raise?
This is not a Askholio session, read between the lines on any comments I post, you are granted that permission.
13 Jan 2026 2:17 pm
Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑ Jeanine Pirro Is Going After Powell, Heedless of Backlash
She has no professional reputation to lose...
https://youtu.be/tMlKmELIhgY?si=X2ng-G5gnTQVIdhC
The fake news dickhead is raging again
13 Jan 2026 2:54 pm
Yes sir, the liars in the media blow it up his *** and he craps it out here like the spineless traitor he is.
13 Jan 2026 2:55 pm
No one noticed, I'm sure...Fuelman » 13 Jan 2026, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ Lawfare? Quite possible, not that it's hasn't been happening for some time now.
This is not a Askholio session, read between the lines on any comments I post, you are granted that permission.
You must be done asking questions, then.
13 Jan 2026 3:05 pm
He's a bad seedmurdock » 13 Jan 2026, 3:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Yes sir, the liars in the media blow it up his *** and he craps it out here like the spineless traitor he is.
13 Jan 2026 4:14 pm
Here's what the smart people think. They better hope his department is squeaky clean!
Smart People in Economics and Business React to DOJ Powell Probe - Business Insider https://share.google/pPvBFTQl6Rzh4xBzJ
Here's what smart people in economics and business are saying about the DOJ's Fed probe
Smart People in Economics and Business React to DOJ Powell Probe - Business Insider https://share.google/pPvBFTQl6Rzh4xBzJ
Here's what smart people in economics and business are saying about the DOJ's Fed probe
Who is online
In total there are 5334 users online :: 11 registered, 16 bots, and 5307 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Funny Guy, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: ADmantX, DuckDuckBot, Mediatoolkitbot, MicroMessenger, proximic, Bolt, YandexBot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, Baiduspider, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, CensysInspect, CriteoBot, bingbot