Vegas » 13 Jan 2026, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ It is said that Tyler Robinson used a .30-06. As I have stated many times, I am not knowledgeable about guns. However, I have heard from many people who do know quite a bit that the size of that bullet would have taken Charlie Kirk's head clean off. It is used to hunt elk and bears. What are your thoughts?
@Huey
@Blackvegetable you don't know **** about anything. So, stay out of this.
you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.Vegas » 13 Jan 2026, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ It is said that Tyler Robinson used a .30-06. As I have stated many times, I am not knowledgeable about guns. However, I have heard from many people who do know quite a bit that the size of that bullet would have taken Charlie Kirk's head clean off. It is used to hunt elk and bears. What are your thoughts?
@Huey
@Blackvegetable you don't know **** about anything. So, stay out of this.
Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.
Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.
What a **** joke. His question to Huey was based solely on "merit". And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2026, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.
Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.
That FDBHW of yours keeps calling meMR-7 » 13 Jan 2026, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ What a **** joke. His question to Huey was based solely on "merit". And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.
Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.
Huey » 13 Jan 2026, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Yeah, it is a decent round. It is basically a 308 bullet with a larger case allowing more powder. It is used, depending on the round you use, for deer to moose to bear.
I only shot one once.
Take much of it off.Vegas » 13 Jan 2026, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ What would something like that do to a person's head shot from 200 feet away?
@BlackvegetableMR-7 » 13 Jan 2026, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ What a **** joke. His question to Huey was based solely on "merit". And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.
Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.
I think your query could be more aptly answered by the type of projectile.Vegas » 13 Jan 2026, 2:08 pm » wrote: ↑ It is said that Tyler Robinson used a .30-06. As I have stated many times, I am not knowledgeable about guns. However, I have heard from many people who do know quite a bit that the size of that bullet would have taken Charlie Kirk's head clean off. It is used to hunt elk and bears.
So many factors...Bullet type...full metal jacket vs. soft‑point, etc....Angle of impact...What tissue/bone it strikes...Whether it yaws, fragments, or passes through.....RebelGator » 13 Jan 2026, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑ I think your query could be more aptly answered by the type of projectile.
I don't pretend to be an expert, though I have fired many rounds thru my 30.06 and did some reloading with different type bullets and powders.
MR-7 » 13 Jan 2026, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ So many factors...Bullet type...full metal jacket vs. soft‑point, etc....Angle of impact...What tissue/bone it strikes...Whether it yaws, fragments, or passes through.....
The claim that “it couldn’t have been a .30‑06 because it didn’t take his head off” is not supported by physics or forensic reality. And the reporting from multiple outlets confirms that investigators identified a .30‑06 Mauser rifle as the weapon used. A 150gr FMJ might yaw late and pass through cleanly. A 180gr soft‑point might expand early and dump it's energy fast. A 165gr FMJ might yaw unpredictably depending on the angle. All I am saying is a .30‑06 regardless of grain—does NOT “take someone’s head off.” That’s a movie myth, not real ballistics.Vegas » 13 Jan 2026, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ It would have taken his head off. These other factors seemingly address how far the pieces of his cranium and brain would have splattered.
MR-7 » 13 Jan 2026, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ The claim that “it couldn’t have been a .30‑06 because it didn’t take his head off” is not supported by physics or forensic reality. And the reporting from multiple outlets confirms that investigators identified a .30‑06 Mauser rifle as the weapon used. A 150gr FMJ might yaw late and pass through cleanly. A 180gr soft‑point might expand early and dump it's energy fast. A 165gr FMJ might yaw unpredictably depending on the angle. All I am saying is a .30‑06 regardless of grain—does NOT “take someone’s head off.” That’s a movie myth, not real ballistics.
Also, he was shot in the neck.MR-7 » 13 Jan 2026, 3:34 pm » wrote: ↑ The claim that “it couldn’t have been a .30‑06 because it didn’t take his head off” is not supported by physics or forensic reality. And the reporting from multiple outlets confirms that investigators identified a .30‑06 Mauser rifle as the weapon used. A 150gr FMJ might yaw late and pass through cleanly. A 180gr soft‑point might expand early and dump it's energy fast. A 165gr FMJ might yaw unpredictably depending on the angle. All I am saying is a .30‑06 regardless of grain—does NOT “take someone’s head off.” That’s a movie myth, not real ballistics.
Very true
Please share what proof you have...
Whatever the **** that is supposed to mean.MR-7 » 13 Jan 2026, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ What a **** joke. His question to Huey was based solely on "merit". And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.
Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.
R these your words?
I commend you for staying away from a firearms topic for once.