Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Another Hoax Bites The Dust....
Another Hoax Bites The Dust....
By Blackvegetable
14 Jan 2026 10:10 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
9 posts • Page 1 of 1
14 Jan 2026 10:10 am
Initial Review Finds No Widespread Illegal Voting by Migrants, Puncturing a Trump Claim
Republican election officials welcome the review, which relies on a federal verification tool, but they say they have not discovered a major problem when it comes to noncitizen voters.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/14/us/p ... -tool.html
APOSTASY!
They'll surely burn in Hell for this!
Republican election officials welcome the review, which relies on a federal verification tool, but they say they have not discovered a major problem when it comes to noncitizen voters.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/14/us/p ... -tool.html
APOSTASY!
They'll surely burn in Hell for this!
14 Jan 2026 10:10 am
Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ Initial Review Finds No Widespread Illegal Voting by Migrants, Puncturing a Trump Claim
Republican election officials welcome the review, which relies on a federal verification tool, but they say they have not discovered a major problem when it comes to noncitizen voters.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/14/us/p ... -tool.html
APOSTASY!
They'll surely burn in Hell for this!
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
14 Jan 2026 11:54 am
"noncitizen voters" ?Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ Initial Review Finds No Widespread Illegal Voting by Migrants, Puncturing a Trump Claim
Republican election officials welcome the review, which relies on a federal verification tool, but they say they have not discovered a major problem when it comes to noncitizen voters.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/14/us/p ... -tool.html
APOSTASY!
They'll surely burn in Hell for this!
Do you even read the stupid **** that you regurgitate?
14 Jan 2026 11:55 am
14 Jan 2026 11:56 am
You continue to confirm that I need not read your ****.RebelGator » 14 Jan 2026, 12:54 pm » wrote: ↑ "noncitizen voters" ?
Do you even read the stupid **** that you regurgitate?
14 Jan 2026 11:56 am
14 Jan 2026 12:07 pm
A hoax? You leftist morons can't even define a women. Bspecial =Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ Initial Review Finds No Widespread Illegal Voting by Migrants, Puncturing a Trump Claim
Republican election officials welcome the review, which relies on a federal verification tool, but they say they have not discovered a major problem when it comes to noncitizen voters.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/14/us/p ... -tool.html
APOSTASY!
They'll surely burn in Hell for this!
14 Jan 2026 12:08 pm
Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2026, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ You continue to confirm that I need not read your ****.
You should, then you would know who can vote in US elections.
14 Jan 2026 12:33 pm
You should make it worth reading...
9 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 5568 users online :: 11 registered, 19 bots, and 5538 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, Deezer Shoove, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: DuckDuckBot, Mediatoolkitbot, MicroMessenger, proximic, CensysInspect, Bolt, SiteLockSpider, ADmantX, aiohttp, YandexBot, okhttp, Applebot, Googlebot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, CriteoBot