Blackvegetable » 16 Jan 2026, 7:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump Sets Fraudster Free From Prison for a Second Time
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/16/us/p ... ardon.html
The president issued a raft of clemency grants this week, including pardoning a woman he had given relief to once before and a man whose daughter had donated millions to a Trump super PAC.
Because, clearly, he exercised such fabulous judgment the first time....
Maybe he's just cadging for votes at the bottom of the barrel.


From you?

Don't be such a moron.
Near **** Uranusnefarious101 » 16 Jan 2026, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ ok...you're a bitter old man in a dress dickhead
because I say so
I know dickhead....believe me....we all know

Ok....but I knew that...nefarious101 » 17 Jan 2026, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ I know ...believe me....we all know....I'm the ClitFace...
There's other people here.. You should talk to your penis in private ****.
JohnnyYou » 17 Jan 2026, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ There's other people here.. You should talk to your penis in private ****.

You're the Swapalotamus Swinger dude.nefarious101 » 17 Jan 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑ Good try DEI
but it makes you sound gay
that would be intentional would it?
Blackvegetable » 16 Jan 2026, 7:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump Sets Fraudster Free From Prison for a Second Time
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/16/us/p ... ardon.html
The president issued a raft of clemency grants this week, including pardoning a woman he had given relief to once before and a man whose daughter had donated millions to a Trump super PAC.
Because, clearly, he exercised such fabulous judgment the first time....
Maybe he's just cadging for votes at the bottom of the barrel.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.