Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:06 am

Ryan has been critical of Manning and the U-Va. board’s leadership. In a November letter to faculty, Ryan wrote that Manning had initially told him not to resign as the Justice Department escalated its pressure on the institution. However, Ryan wrote that Manning later told him that the governor and Sheridan needed him to resign. Ryan said Manning had also heard from the Justice Department that if Ryan did not resign, officials would “bleed UVA white.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... jay-jones/

Do you idiots understand how Grifty sees the Law?

Kill yourselves en masse...

Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:07 am

Try it without a paywall.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:06 am

Ryan has been critical of Manning and the U-Va. board’s leadership. In a November letter to faculty, Ryan wrote that Manning had initially told him not to resign as the Justice Department escalated its pressure on the institution. However, Ryan wrote that Manning later told him that the governor and Sheridan needed him to resign. Ryan said Manning had also heard from the Justice Department that if Ryan did not resign, officials would “bleed UVA white.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... jay-jones/

Do you idiots understand how Grifty sees the Law?

Kill yourselves en masse...

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:10 am

Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:07 am

Try it without a paywall.

What happened to your subscription? 


What information do you need?
 

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:06 am

Ryan has been critical of Manning and the U-Va. board’s leadership. In a November letter to faculty, Ryan wrote that Manning had initially told him not to resign as the Justice Department escalated its pressure on the institution. However, Ryan wrote that Manning later told him that the governor and Sheridan needed him to resign. Ryan said Manning had also heard from the Justice Department that if Ryan did not resign, officials would “bleed UVA white.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... jay-jones/

Do you idiots understand how Grifty sees the Law?

Kill yourselves en masse...

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:13 am

I cancelled it when they want ed120 bucks for a year.  I was on a $29 trial plan.  I doubt you have the amount of subscriptions you claim to have.  NYTs, Bloomberg, WAPO etc.  

So where did you get that citation from?

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:20 am

All, plus VF and LRB...

The link is quite clearly there....

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 17 Jan 2026, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:20 am

Deal:

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:32 am

How can this NOT be what you called "Stalking"?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:06 am

Ryan has been critical of Manning and the U-Va. board’s leadership. In a November letter to faculty, Ryan wrote that Manning had initially told him not to resign as the Justice Department escalated its pressure on the institution. However, Ryan wrote that Manning later told him that the governor and Sheridan needed him to resign. Ryan said Manning had also heard from the Justice Department that if Ryan did not resign, officials would “bleed UVA white.”

no spam

Do you idiots understand how Grifty sees the Law?

Kill yourselves en masse...

Vegas » 17 Jan 2026, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:38 am

Shut up. I am not the one who spends hours and hours in your profile.

JohnnyYou » 17 Jan 2026, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:39 am

You are a lurker in your own mind Vegas.
 
Have you seen the "View Digest For ______" button on the software screen yet? It can be useful.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:06 am

Do you idiots understand how Grifty sees the Law?

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:20 am

Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 11:13 am

I cancelled it when they want ed120 bucks for a year.  I was on a $29 trial plan.  I doubt you have the amount of subscriptions you claim to have.  NYTs, Bloomberg, WAPO etc.  

So where did you get that citation from?

All, plus VF and LRB...


The link is quite clearly there....

 

Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 1:51 pm

I didn't say the link wasn't there, retard, I said "Try it without a paywall" and implied someone told you think that.  Hard to discuss an article that many can't open.

Have fun.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 1:55 pm

Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 1:51 pm

I didn't say the link wasn't there, retard, I said "Try it without a paywall" and implied someone told you think that.  Hard to discuss an article that many can't open.

Have fun.

You yap a lot of pointless things in your desperation to divert....


I simply reported on what a Youngkin appointee to the board is quoted as having said.

You, of course, can't respond to the OP and must try to make it about the poster.
 

 

Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 2:03 pm

Try have a habit of cherry picking 

Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 2:03 pm

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 1:55 pm

Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 1:51 pm

I didn't say the link wasn't there, retard, I said "Try it without a paywall" and implied someone told you think that.  Hard to discuss an article that many can't open.

Have fun.

You yap a lot of pointless things in your desperation to divert....


I simply reported on what a Youngkin appointee to the board is quoted as having said.

You, of course, can't respond to the OP and must try to make it about the poster.
 


 

YOU have a habit of cherry picking parts of an article and leaving out other parts that refute your own posts.  So, post the entire article of **** off, Corky.

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 2:06 pm

Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2026, 2:03 pm

Try have a habit of cherry picking 

You have a habit of lying.

What context do you believe makes the reported threat acceptable?