"Post the entire thing, or I win!" doesn't hunt, child.
Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑ "Post the entire thing, or I win!" doesn't hunt, child.
If there is a rule to that effect, you should state it..
You don't understand.Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑
I accept your surrender. Only pussies edit quotes. You used to whine bout that at USMB. Where it is agains the rules.
Not at all.Huey » 17 Jan 2026, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑ You have not posted anything to discuss. You have words you claim are from that article. But it is behind a payroll. So, since you refuse to post the article or another link, you have nothing for me to comment about.
So, see ya elsewhere.
Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ I'm curious, @Deezer Shoove
How can this NOT be what you called "Stalking"?
You're full of ****, you constantly edit quotes by erasing content....you really are a stupid ***.Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ You don't understand.
Edit means to change words in a post...
That is what the USMB rule is about.
****, are you stupid.
Here's where you are even more stupid.
The University of Virginia is in Virginia....the porch under which you huddle in flopsweat is in Virginia.
You should have PLENTY of local sources for this story.
Shoove the Black Vegetable to the side. Eat more roadkill.DeezerShoove » 17 Jan 2026, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ It seems like this is between you two heathens.
Maybe he just wants your opinion. Do you have one?
It's not like you're being tagged about any and all irrelevant ****.
DeezerShoove » 17 Jan 2026, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑ It seems like this is between you two heathens.
Maybe he just wants your opinion. Do you have one?
It's not like you're being tagged about any and all irrelevant ****.
to whom?It seems
I defined the concept in my own words...Maybe he just wants your opinion. Do you have one?
To what is it relevant?It's not like you're being tagged about any and all irrelevant ****.
Holy ****. 3 **** questions in one post. Knock it off! Answer some first.Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑ to whom?
I've told you otherwise.....as has @Vegas
What does it take?
I defined the concept in my own words...
To what is it relevant?
No...that's excerpting...RebelGator » 17 Jan 2026, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ You're full of ****, you constantly edit quotes by erasing content...
You know how to end this. Now shut up. and do it.Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑ My cowardice is irreversible.
I can't even come up with my own content. Hence, my incessant copying of others.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑ Ryan has been critical of Manning and the U-Va. board’s leadership. In a November letter to faculty, Ryan wrote that Manning had initially told him not to resign as the Justice Department escalated its pressure on the institution. However, Ryan wrote that Manning later told him that the governor and Sheridan needed him to resign. Ryan said Manning had also heard from the Justice Department that if Ryan did not resign, officials would “bleed UVA white.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va ... jay-jones/
Do you idiots understand how Grifty sees the Law?
Kill yourselves en masse...
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
No, you're still full of ****, to excerpt doesn't mean erase everything but one word, like you constantly do....Doo-Doo Brain.Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2026, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑ No...that's excerpting...
It's an entirely different word.
**** ignores the function which let's you do EXACTLY that on usmb.
RebelGator » 17 Jan 2026, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you're still full of ****, to excerpt doesn't mean erase everything but one word, like you constantly do....Doo-Doo Brain.
As I do with your posts?RebelGator » 17 Jan 2026, 4:42 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you're still full of ****, to excerpt doesn't mean erase everything but one word, like you constantly do....Doo-Doo Brain.