and if it goes to court, it'll all be subject to juror's interpretation....Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2026, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I won't tell you what the conclusion was. You'll have to watch the video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXwN_FCANtY
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The ice agent was justified in my opinion, the first shot went through the windshield, proving he was in front of the car. The fact that the car actually hit him is further proof he was in front of the car..Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2026, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I won't tell you what the conclusion was. You'll have to watch the video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXwN_FCANtY
Well, if you had watched the video, you would know that a bit more goes into deciding accountability than only that.Cedar » 19 Jan 2026, 1:20 am » wrote: ↑ The ice agent was justified in my opinion, the first shot went through the windshield, proving he was in front of the car. The fact that the car actually hit him is further proof he was in front of the car..
Negligence on the part of the woman who was shot.Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2026, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I won't tell you what the conclusion was. You'll have to watch the video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXwN_FCANtY
Cedar » 19 Jan 2026, 1:20 am » wrote: ↑ The ice agent was justified in my opinion, the first shot went through the windshield, proving he was in front of the car. The fact that the car actually hit him is further proof he was in front of the car..
There are other laws at play here other than hind sight. Nature's law. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2026, 2:18 am » wrote: ↑ Well, if you had watched the video, you would know that a bit more goes into deciding accountability than only that.
For example, we could ask WHY he was in front of her car. Did you know that he had to get OUT of a different car in order to get in front of hers? And that the car he got out of could have blocked hers in? The other two agents likewise debarked a perfectly serviceable SUV that could have prevented the thespian from using her vehicle as a nuclear device intended to blow up the entire city - a fate from which society was narrowly spared by the courageous, life-on-the-line derring-do of that fine, heroic policeman who shot the unarmed soccer mom.
If he put himself in harm's way as a pretext to murder - understandable though it may be, - then he is culpable under the law.
So your "He got an actual bruise" defense is not the iron-clad trump card you might have thought a bruise to be.
You are one to discuss negligence rk..roadkill » 19 Jan 2026, 2:38 am » wrote: ↑ Negligence on the part of the woman who was shot.
And yes...I watched the whole video.
The stupid part is, they (and women especially) must think it's either a game or they're safe because no one would hurt a woman...roadkill » 19 Jan 2026, 2:56 am » wrote: ↑ There are other laws at play here other than hind sight. Nature's law. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Would you or I pull our car in harms way like she did. Hell No!
I'd say being dumbed down also played a role. The people who allowed illegals into our country carry the biggest blame.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom SOP is to ensure there are no surprises hidden within the vehicle when approaching, which is why when you see officers approaching a vehicle, they go up both sides. With her car perpendicular blocking the lane, Ross ended up having to circle the vehicle. Him recording was to ID the vehicle in case she fled as they were asking her to get out of her vehicle...the timing was unfortunate...JohnnyYou » 19 Jan 2026, 3:32 am » wrote: ↑ You are one to discuss negligence rk..
At least CP doesn't neglect a basic moral code that is in every living thing. You are trying to fight it constantly.
Maybe I'll find time to watch the video and engage further.
On the face of it, Ross did not like lesbian activists and he decided in an instant (or maybe Ross had discussed it with others in conspiracy prior) to murder one from my perspective. I think CP is pointing out fairly that Ross put himself in the situation on purpose. For such a serious bruise on the leg from the 2 mph impact, he did keep his balance and pump 3 more rounds as she drove by. The "**** Bitch" comment as her dead pedal to the medal foot accelerated the car to impact in parked cars is absolutely bone chilling movie shyt.
The fact the FBI cutoff any MN state investigation is about as transparent as the Trump shyt MAGA eats all day long.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Duh...ROG62 » 19 Jan 2026, 1:05 am » wrote: ↑ and if it goes to court, it'll all be subject to juror's interpretation....
Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2026, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I won't tell you what the conclusion was. You'll have to watch the video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXwN_FCANtY
ROG62 » 19 Jan 2026, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ SOP is to ensure there are no surprises hidden within the vehicle when approaching, which is why when you see officers approaching a vehicle, they go up both sides. With her car perpendicular blocking the lane, Ross ended up having to circle the vehicle. Him recording was to ID the vehicle in case she fled as they were asking her to get out of her vehicle...the timing was unfortunate...
With her car perpendicular blocking the lane, Ross ended up having to circle the vehicle.
Which kind of accountability? Personal, social consensus, political, spiritual, economical, ancestral, generation gap, siblings, cousins, every other ancestral lineage but one's own time living in their own skin, now.Cannonpointer » 19 Jan 2026, 2:18 am » wrote: ↑ Well, if you had watched the video, you would know that a bit more goes into deciding accountability than only that.
For example, we could ask WHY he was in front of her car. Did you know that he had to get OUT of a different car in order to get in front of hers? And that the car he got out of could have blocked hers in? The other two agents likewise debarked a perfectly serviceable SUV that could have prevented the thespian from using her vehicle as a nuclear device intended to blow up the entire city - a fate from which society was narrowly spared by the courageous, life-on-the-line derring-do of that fine, heroic policeman who shot the unarmed soccer mom.
If he put himself in harm's way as a pretext to murder - understandable though it may be, - then he is culpable under the law.
So your "He got an actual bruise" defense is not the iron-clad trump card you might have thought a bruise to be.
ALL 12:42 is ****.Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2026, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I won't tell you what the conclusion was. You'll have to watch the video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXwN_FCANtY
TLDR.Cannonpointer » 18 Jan 2026, 10:19 pm » wrote: ↑ I won't tell you what the conclusion was. You'll have to watch the video...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXwN_FCANtY
Great minds only recite what people chose throughout history to believe life is more than actual time living simply adapting to the moment here.
As CP has indicated.. Ross had a vehicle he could have parked infront of Renee's ride.ROG62 » 19 Jan 2026, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑ SOP is to ensure there are no surprises hidden within the vehicle when approaching, which is why when you see officers approaching a vehicle, they go up both sides. With her car perpendicular blocking the lane, Ross ended up having to circle the vehicle. Him recording was to ID the vehicle in case she fled as they were asking her to get out of her vehicle...the timing was unfortunate...