LowIQTrash » 25 Jan 2026, 3:53 am » wrote: ↑
I will be the most annoying member on this board
- FAR MORE annoying than even Vegas is to R "Eggplant" copying and posting his "Which of th3se is an example of survivorship bias?"

-
...when the SP 500 Ponzi tops out and begins its descent to 4000.
(And I have reason to believe it will go much lower than that by 2029)
Nasdaq to 7700
Few understand this.

You’re basically saying the market is a bubble propped up by liquidity and passive inflows, and once that dries up the S&P dumps to 4000 and the Nasdaq retraces to 7700. That’s not a ‘Ponzi’ in the literal sense — it’s just your macro bear thesis. If you’ve got actual reasoning, cycles, liquidity models, earnings projections, or credit data behind those numbers, post it. Otherwise, it’s just another doom call with round numbers.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic.
Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....
Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.