Antifa wear Crocs, like you probably do.
My question is why don't you correctly identify her as an agitator?Vegas » 26 Jan 2026, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ It has been claimed several times that he was trying to help a woman who was pushed to the ground. Then all hell broke loose.
Let's rewind.
Why did the lady approach the officers in the first place?
She was also a protestor. I would like to know if she was preventing ICE from doing their job, like most of the protestors there are doing. This matters, because if she had not interfered, then Pretti would still be alive. She indirectly killed him.
JohnnyYou » 27 Jan 2026, 6:33 am » wrote: ↑ ICE is withdrawing.. Bovino has been taken off of command. Ho' Man is coming to town.
If we find out the Sig P320 accidently discharged, did SIG indirectly kill him?Vegas » 26 Jan 2026, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ It has been claimed several times that he was trying to help a woman who was pushed to the ground. Then all hell broke loose.
Let's rewind.
Why did the lady approach the officers in the first place?
She was also a protestor. I would like to know if she was preventing ICE from doing their job, like most of the protestors there are doing. This matters, because if she had not interfered, then Pretti would still be alive. She indirectly killed him.
Why not blame the weather if the gun slipped out of his hand....you leftists are retarded.*Roshambo » 27 Jan 2026, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ If we find out the Sig P320 accidently discharged, did SIG indirectly kill him?
This Homo is getting handjobs from Buck NakedRebelGator » 27 Jan 2026, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ Why not blame the weather if the gun slipped out of his hand....you leftists are retarded.
That analogy does not work. The point is that Pretti would be alive had she not agitated ICE. It's highly unlikely that ICE arbitrarily chose her out of the protest, waved her over, and then started an altercation. She interfered and Pretti died because of it.*Roshambo » 27 Jan 2026, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ If we find out the Sig P320 accidently discharged, did SIG indirectly kill him?
RebelGator » 27 Jan 2026, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑ My question is why don't you correctly identify her as an agitator?
*Roshambo » 27 Jan 2026, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑ 33 to .35, this is the officer approaching the woman. .37, the officer sprays Pretti. Moving forward, it seems that Pretti was protecting the woman. The officer pulls him away from the woman, and several officers intervene, restraining him, seizing his firearm, and executing him. Did you observe him brandishing the weapon? I did not. In the State of Minnesota, when properly licensed, individuals are permitted to carry a firearm to a protest. This pertains to the Second Amendment. This concerns Trump and his administration's assertion that one cannot carry a firearm to a protest. From my perspective, Pretti, before assisting the woman, did not confront an officer in an aggressive manner. It was only after the officers began to force him to the ground that he began to resist. Resisting arrest. Keep in mind, no weapon was brandished. During the arrest, a firearm was identified. They confiscated that firearm. Subsequently, we witnessed an execution. Were the officers frightened? Certainly, cowardly and untrained individuals become fearful when they are uncertain of their actions.
Exercise of the 1st amendment which includes filming law enforcement cannot be an excuse for criminalizing exercise of the 2nd amendment. Being armed while being detained cannot be grounds for summary execution.
https://i.postimg.cc/x8HRC3kv/push.jpg
True. But then I wouldn't have anything to complain about.DeezerShoove » 26 Jan 2026, 11:40 pm » wrote: ↑ My "different question" to ask:
Why do we try these cases in the court of public opinion?
Whether or not that I care about it at all has no bearing on the legal proceedings.
My apparent apathy belies my motive. I'm sick of bickering with fellow mere spectators.
Morons bellowing "Moron!" back and forth . . .
To me I see collateral damage as the Four Year Mess gets mopped up.
I want very little to do with either side of it. LEO needs to step in so criminals get uncomfortable.
I'm staying out of their way. Foreigners don't deserve my "help".
I'm already paying for their stay... Now paying for their exit.
Protestors can go **** themselves.
Not going to change your mind, you are not going to change mine.Vegas » 27 Jan 2026, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ That analogy does not work. The point is that Pretti would be alive had she not agitated ICE. It's highly unlikely that ICE arbitrarily chose her out of the protest, waved her over, and then started an altercation. She interfered and Pretti died because of it.
I'm afraid you've lost me on this one.
Cannonpointer » 27 Jan 2026, 12:59 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm afraid you've lost me on this one.
Sounds like **** to me.
SouthernFried » 26 Jan 2026, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody cares dude. In the span of a week, this will be buried, old news and you will have moved on to your 10th new outrage by then.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Damn, the VaG must of grabbed the wrong propaganda clip...Vegas » 26 Jan 2026, 9:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Are we watching the same video. At 0.35 , she kept approaching the ICE agents and ICE was pushing her away. She kept coming and coming. Where exactly are you seeing ICE approaching her?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ****, many people careSouthernFried » 26 Jan 2026, 8:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Nobody cares dude. In the span of a week, this will be buried, old news and you will have moved on to your 10th new outrage by then.
it's because it's become about feefees and not facts...DeezerShoove » 26 Jan 2026, 11:40 pm » wrote: ↑ My "different question" to ask:
Why do we try these cases in the court of public opinion?
Whether or not that I care about it at all has no bearing on the legal proceedings.
My apparent apathy belies my motive. I'm sick of bickering with fellow mere spectators.
Morons bellowing "Moron!" back and forth . . .
To me I see collateral damage as the Four Year Mess gets mopped up.
I want very little to do with either side of it. LEO needs to step in so criminals get uncomfortable.
I'm staying out of their way. Foreigners don't deserve my "help".
I'm already paying for their stay... Now paying for their exit.
Protestors can go **** themselves.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom not without ID and permit card...which he did not have on him...*Roshambo » 27 Jan 2026, 6:23 am » wrote: ↑ 33 to .35, this is the officer approaching the woman. .37, the officer sprays Pretti. Moving forward, it seems that Pretti was protecting the woman. The officer pulls him away from the woman, and several officers intervene, restraining him, seizing his firearm, and executing him. Did you observe him brandishing the weapon? I did not. In the State of Minnesota, when properly licensed, individuals are permitted to carry a firearm to a protest. This pertains to the Second Amendment. This concerns Trump and his administration's assertion that one cannot carry a firearm to a protest. From my perspective, Pretti, before assisting the woman, did not confront an officer in an aggressive manner. It was only after the officers began to force him to the ground that he began to resist. Resisting arrest. Keep in mind, no weapon was brandished. During the arrest, a firearm was identified. They confiscated that firearm. Subsequently, we witnessed an execution. Were the officers frightened? Certainly, cowardly and untrained individuals become fearful when they are uncertain of their actions.
Exercise of the 1st amendment which includes filming law enforcement cannot be an excuse for criminalizing exercise of the 2nd amendment. Being armed while being detained cannot be grounds for summary execution.
https://i.postimg.cc/x8HRC3kv/push.jpg
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom LMAO. The woman-balls terrify you.*Roshambo » 27 Jan 2026, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑ And let's be clear, this was the family dog. You don't kill the dog, you rehome it. Some dogs are hunters and some are not.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/fX1AQwZB ... ture=share