Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
In 2024 Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Argued No Right to Carry a Gun at ‘Political Rallies and Protests’...
In 2024 Minnesota AG Keith Ellison Argued No Right to Carry a Gun at ‘Political Rallies and Protests’...
By ROG62
27 Jan 2026 8:22 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
6 posts • Page 1 of 1
27 Jan 2026 8:22 am
The AGs did this in a January 26, 2024, filing in support of upholding California’s gun controls for “sensitive places” in a Ninth Circuit case.
In the filing, Ellison and the other AGs expressed support for banning the possession of firearms “in crowded places.”
The AGs wrote: “Without the power to institute such restrictions, California and other states would be left unable effectively to prevent gun violence in crowded places, around vulnerable populations, or where individuals are exercising other constitutionally protected rights, putting the public at risk.”
They emphasized, “Even the perceived risk of gun violence could cause repercussions, as individuals may be discouraged from visiting crowded or confined locations where they know others may be armed.”
To bolster their argument, Ellison and the other AGs noted the practice of designating “event involving political speech, like political rallies and protests,” as gun-free sensitive places.
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment ... -protests/
As Ellison recently defended Pretti's right to carry (apparently w/o permit or ID], One needs to ask, why are libtardos such hypocrites?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
In the filing, Ellison and the other AGs expressed support for banning the possession of firearms “in crowded places.”
The AGs wrote: “Without the power to institute such restrictions, California and other states would be left unable effectively to prevent gun violence in crowded places, around vulnerable populations, or where individuals are exercising other constitutionally protected rights, putting the public at risk.”
They emphasized, “Even the perceived risk of gun violence could cause repercussions, as individuals may be discouraged from visiting crowded or confined locations where they know others may be armed.”
To bolster their argument, Ellison and the other AGs noted the practice of designating “event involving political speech, like political rallies and protests,” as gun-free sensitive places.
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment ... -protests/
As Ellison recently defended Pretti's right to carry (apparently w/o permit or ID], One needs to ask, why are libtardos such hypocrites?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." 
27 Jan 2026 8:27 am
JuCo,ROG62 » 27 Jan 2026, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ The AGs did this in a January 26, 2024, filing in support of upholding California’s gun controls for “sensitive places” in a Ninth Circuit case.
In the filing, Ellison and the other AGs expressed support for banning the possession of firearms “in crowded places.”
The AGs wrote: “Without the power to institute such restrictions, California and other states would be left unable effectively to prevent gun violence in crowded places, around vulnerable populations, or where individuals are exercising other constitutionally protected rights, putting the public at risk.”
They emphasized, “Even the perceived risk of gun violence could cause repercussions, as individuals may be discouraged from visiting crowded or confined locations where they know others may be armed.”
To bolster their argument, Ellison and the other AGs noted the practice of designating “event involving political speech, like political rallies and protests,” as gun-free sensitive places.
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment ... -protests/
As Ellison recently defended Pretti's right to carry (apparently w/o permit or ID], One needs to ask, why are libtardos such hypocrites?
Come on man. What difference, at this point, does it make?
What you saw was wrong, you know it was wrong. Get back to "right and wrong"
Stop the right vs. left playbook. This is unsustainable.
chase me
fried
I live rent free in your mind
friedI live rent free in your mind
27 Jan 2026 8:28 am
Liars, hoaxers, and hypocrites.....Democrat virtues.ROG62 » 27 Jan 2026, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑ The AGs did this in a January 26, 2024, filing in support of upholding California’s gun controls for “sensitive places” in a Ninth Circuit case.
In the filing, Ellison and the other AGs expressed support for banning the possession of firearms “in crowded places.”
The AGs wrote: “Without the power to institute such restrictions, California and other states would be left unable effectively to prevent gun violence in crowded places, around vulnerable populations, or where individuals are exercising other constitutionally protected rights, putting the public at risk.”
They emphasized, “Even the perceived risk of gun violence could cause repercussions, as individuals may be discouraged from visiting crowded or confined locations where they know others may be armed.”
To bolster their argument, Ellison and the other AGs noted the practice of designating “event involving political speech, like political rallies and protests,” as gun-free sensitive places.
https://www.breitbart.com/2nd-amendment ... -protests/
As Ellison recently defended Pretti's right to carry (apparently w/o permit or ID], One needs to ask, why are libtardos such hypocrites?
27 Jan 2026 8:42 am
He's a **** hypocrite, just like "most" politicians...*Roshambo » 27 Jan 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ JuCo,
Come on man. What difference, at this point, does it make?
What you saw was wrong, you know it was wrong. Get back to "right and wrong"
Stop the right vs. left playbook. This is unsustainable.
the narrative demands he cries wolf now, like ALL anti second amendment proponents...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
27 Jan 2026 8:43 am
A sordid bunch at best...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
27 Jan 2026 8:45 am
What you saw was wrong, you know it was wrong. Get back to "right and wrong"ROG62 » 27 Jan 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ He's a **** hypocrite, just like "most" politicians...
the narrative demands he cries wolf now, like ALL anti second amendment proponents...
Stop the right vs. left playbook. This is unsustainable.
chase me
fried
I live rent free in your mind
friedI live rent free in your mind
6 posts • Page 1 of 1
Who is online
In total there are 4835 users online :: 4 registered, 13 bots, and 4818 guests
Bots: proximic, ADmantX, aiohttp, DuckDuckBot, curl/7, CriteoBot, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, Applebot, Googlebot, bingbot