It's only a matter of time before you election riggers will see the inside of a jail cell....granted you're only a small blemish, next to a liver spot on Biden's ***, but the penalties will be all encompassing at every level of the conspiracy.Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ From DEI to DAB
Tulsi Gabbard under scrutiny for showing up at FBI raid of Georgia election hub
In her role overseeing the country’s spy agencies, Gabbard is prohibited by law from taking part in domestic law enforcement
https://share.google/jgbmCeo288K4Wy0RR
******* skank.
Ain't worth reading.RebelGator » 30 Jan 2026, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ It's only a matter of time before you election riggers will see the inside of a jail cell....granted you're only a small blemish, next to a liver spot on Biden's ***, but the penalties will be all encompassing at every level of the conspiracy.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑ Ain't worth reading.
Your terminal corn dog awaits, Cracker
Why would I fear what you make up?
Tulsi is present, fulfilling her responsibilities, and she will demonstrate that the votes were transmitted via satellite to Italy and altered. When Trump stated that arrests are imminent, he was serious.Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ From DEI to DAB
Tulsi Gabbard under scrutiny for showing up at FBI raid of Georgia election hub
In her role overseeing the country’s spy agencies, Gabbard is prohibited by law from taking part in domestic law enforcement
https://share.google/jgbmCeo288K4Wy0RR
******* skank.
All ****, All the Time...*Roshambo » 30 Jan 2026, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ Tulsi is present, fulfilling her responsibilities, and she will demonstrate that the votes were transmitted via satellite to Italy and altered. When Trump stated that arrests are imminent, he was serious.
You should admit to the election fraud, instead of trying to confirm the number of Democrat morons is of such magnitude.Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ All ****, All the Time...
History is gonna **** these yutzes...
Post your evidence.RebelGator » 30 Jan 2026, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑ You should admit to the election fraud, instead of trying to confirm the number of Democrat morons is of such magnitude.
You should know, you've been **** for years...does that mean you're a "yutz"?Blackvegetable » 30 Jan 2026, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ All ****, All the Time...
History is gonna **** these yutzes...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You stopped running to yap that?ROG62 » 30 Jan 2026, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ You should know, you've been **** for years...does that mean you're a "yutz"?
RebelGator » 30 Jan 2026, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ It's only a matter of time before you election riggers will see the inside of a jail cell....granted you're only a small blemish, next to a liver spot on Biden's ***, but the penalties will be all encompassing at every level of the conspiracy.

I remind you againnefarious101 » 30 Jan 2026, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑ seems to be a lot arrests going on all over the place
the only people bitchin' about it are Leftist and the MSM
everyone else wants to see more
LOL....you need to do a restart dickhead....your hard drive is locked up again...try hitting the reality tab and see if that helps

Reality, ClitFace
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ From DEI to DAB
Tulsi Gabbard under scrutiny for showing up at FBI raid of Georgia election hub
In her role overseeing the country’s spy agencies, Gabbard is prohibited by law from taking part in domestic law enforcement
https://share.google/jgbmCeo288K4Wy0RR
******* skank.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
There you go again. Demanding others to post evidence, yet you would do no such thing. Ever.