Liberal Forum

First, I catch him editing AI, then I catch him editing me. Seriously, suicide is the only option for him. He needs to live stream it for our enjoyment. 

My original quote:

So now you are admitting that it's okay to not answer after being asked the first time. 

QED.

And the ****'s version:

it's okay to not answer after being asked the first time.

Then we have this gem. Here is me cooking him well done with side of Trump's baby batter as sauce. He edited AI.

My prompt: Is it accurate for an AI to state that a photograph’s attribution ‘correctly identifies the subject and photographer, making it a reliable source,’ without external verification?

Veghead claimed AI said this: "The attribution correctly identifies both the subjects of the photo and the photographer who captured the moment, making it a reliable source."

AI's reply:

AI cannot confirm the identity of a real person in a photograph.
It can only:

• describe visible features (appearance, clothing, setting),
• note resemblance if asked in a general sense,
• or restate what sources claim without verifying them.

What it cannot do:

• verify who the person actually is,
• confirm that an attribution is correct,
• declare an image or its attribution “reliable” on its own.

 “It cannot confirm identity.”
 That’s not an opinion, a rhetorical move, or a grammar issue — it’s a capability limit.

 Poor @Blackvegetable  He is having a bad week. 
 
 
 

Vegas » 03 Feb 2026, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2026, 8:02 pm

First, I catch him editing AI, then I catch him editing me. Seriously, suicide is the only option for him. He needs to live stream it for our enjoyment. 

My original quote:

And the ****'s version:

Then we have this gem. Here is me cooking him well done with side of Trump's baby batter as sauce. He edited AI.

AI's reply:

He-squeeeeer...

Squeer!
 
Busted desperately editing AI.           

Cannonpointer » 03 Feb 2026, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2026, 8:05 pm

He-squeeeeer...

Squeer!
 
Busted desperately editing AI.         

He tries to get away with this ****, but then falls flat on his face.

Cannonpointer » 03 Feb 2026, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2026, 8:05 pm

He-squeeeeer...

Squeer!
 
Busted desperately editing AI.         

Yous guys are both "so goddamned **** stupid".

^^^ I saw that in a thread here...

DeezerShoove » 04 Feb 2026, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

04 Feb 2026, 6:47 am

Yous guys are both "so goddamned **** stupid".

^^^ I saw that in a thread here...

That's his fall-back, last line of defense after being cyber pepper sprayed.


 

RebelGator » 04 Feb 2026, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑

04 Feb 2026, 7:50 am

That's his fall-back, last line of defense after being cyber pepper sprayed.

   

Vegas » 03 Feb 2026, 8:08 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2026, 8:08 pm

He tries to get away with this ****, but then falls flat on his face.

No worries...I provide the balance.          

DeezerShoove » 04 Feb 2026, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑

04 Feb 2026, 6:47 am

Yous guys are both "so goddamned **** stupid".

^^^ I saw that in a thread here...

Ya gotta leave the "o" out to be a coolguy. It's "g'ddamned'.
 

Who wants to place a bet that in not so distance future, Veghead will pretend that he knows nothing about this, and then demand I repost it all?       
 

Cannonpointer » 04 Feb 2026, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

04 Feb 2026, 10:26 am

Ya gotta leave the "o" out to be a coolguy. It's "g'ddamned'.

S'rry. I guess I **** up.
I d'n't want t' be a **** blasphemer.
 

Vegas » 03 Feb 2026, 8:02 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Feb 2026, 8:02 pm

First, I catch him editing AI, then I catch him editing me. Seriously, suicide is the only option for him. He needs to live stream it for our enjoyment. 

My original quote:

And the ****'s version:

Then we have this gem. Here is me cooking him well done with side of Trump's baby batter as sauce. He edited AI.

AI's reply:

 Poor @Blackvegetable  He is having a bad week.

Not only does he stalk you, but he is also a Quote Faker too
Quote‑faker – internet slang for someone who edits your comment to make you “say” something else.

This **** is insecure. 
 

DeezerShoove » 04 Feb 2026, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Feb 2026, 3:20 pm

S'rry. I guess I **** up.
I d'n't want t' be a **** blasphemer.

G'd o nya, m'te.   
 

NateHiggas » 04 Feb 2026, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Feb 2026, 3:21 pm

Not only does he stalk you, but he is also a Quote Faker too
Quote‑faker – internet slang for someone who edits your comment to make you “say” something else.

This **** is insecure.

Divorced, lives in a Duplex, has Johnny You take shirtless pics of him in his bedroom. Johnny has bragged more than once on here    that BV has BIG BALLS and is a good teacher of Ben Wah balls.    I ask, do we really need any more evidence, than what I have already provided, that these **** are gay? I mean, really? Now, moving right along. He is a POSER. It's true. And he is also a COWARD. The word is he hid like a scared bitch and went into "black-out" mode knowing that the other poster was about 30 mins from his duplex. Rumor has it he paid a neighbor across the street to let him keep his car in their garage overnight. It was also reported that just before the streetlight went out in front of his duplex, an individual heard something that sounded like an air rifle or BB gun had been shot. Insecure...U B the judge.