Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
So What? See The Work on the New Ballroom?
So What? See The Work on the New Ballroom?
By Blackvegetable
4 Feb 2026 8:27 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
4 Feb 2026 8:27 am
Former Farming Leaders Warn U.S. Agriculture Could Face ‘Widespread Collapse’
A group of past government officials and the former heads of farming associations issued a dire warning to members of Congress.
“it is clear that the current administration’s actions, along with congressional inaction, have increased costs for farm inputs, disrupted overseas and domestic markets, denied agriculture its reliable labor pool, and defunded critical ag research and staffing,” the letter warned.
“Our farmers and ranchers can compete with the world, but they can’t compete with the world with a chaotic set of policy circumstances,” one of the signers, Jon Doggett, the former chief executive of the National Corn Growers Association, said in an interview.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/03/us/p ... =url-share
Don't vote your hard-on, *******
A group of past government officials and the former heads of farming associations issued a dire warning to members of Congress.
“it is clear that the current administration’s actions, along with congressional inaction, have increased costs for farm inputs, disrupted overseas and domestic markets, denied agriculture its reliable labor pool, and defunded critical ag research and staffing,” the letter warned.
“Our farmers and ranchers can compete with the world, but they can’t compete with the world with a chaotic set of policy circumstances,” one of the signers, Jon Doggett, the former chief executive of the National Corn Growers Association, said in an interview.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/03/us/p ... =url-share
Don't vote your hard-on, *******
4 Feb 2026 8:29 am
Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Former Farming Leaders Warn U.S. Agriculture Could Face ‘Widespread Collapse’
A group of past government officials and the former heads of farming associations issued a dire warning to members of Congress.
“it is clear that the current administration’s actions, along with congressional inaction, have increased costs for farm inputs, disrupted overseas and domestic markets, denied agriculture its reliable labor pool, and defunded critical ag research and staffing,” the letter warned.
“Our farmers and ranchers can compete with the world, but they can’t compete with the world with a chaotic set of policy circumstances,” one of the signers, Jon Doggett, the former chief executive of the National Corn Growers Association, said in an interview.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/03/us/p ... =url-share
Don't vote your hard-on, *******
4 Feb 2026 8:29 am
Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Former Farming Leaders Warn U.S. Agriculture Could Face ‘Widespread Collapse’
A group of past government officials and the former heads of farming associations issued a dire warning to members of Congress.
“it is clear that the current administration’s actions, along with congressional inaction, have increased costs for farm inputs, disrupted overseas and domestic markets, denied agriculture its reliable labor pool, and defunded critical ag research and staffing,” the letter warned.
“Our farmers and ranchers can compete with the world, but they can’t compete with the world with a chaotic set of policy circumstances,” one of the signers, Jon Doggett, the former chief executive of the National Corn Growers Association, said in an interview.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/03/us/p ... =url-share
Don't vote your hard-on, *******
You learned the "Hard way" on that one didn't you.
4 Feb 2026 8:36 am
Try to convince me that you aren't on the Gay Spectrum.
4 Feb 2026 8:37 am
4 Feb 2026 8:43 am
4 Feb 2026 12:16 pm
4 Feb 2026 12:22 pm
Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Former Farming Leaders Warn U.S. Agriculture Could Face ‘Widespread Collapse’
A group of past government officials and the former heads of farming associations issued a dire warning to members of Congress.
“it is clear that the current administration’s actions, along with congressional inaction, have increased costs for farm inputs, disrupted overseas and domestic markets, denied agriculture its reliable labor pool, and defunded critical ag research and staffing,” the letter warned.
“Our farmers and ranchers can compete with the world, but they can’t compete with the world with a chaotic set of policy circumstances,” one of the signers, Jon Doggett, the former chief executive of the National Corn Growers Association, said in an interview.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/03/us/p ... =url-share
Don't vote your hard-on, *******
The New York Times.....why don't you just quote Vanity Fair or The Atlantic, ***.
4 Feb 2026 1:48 pm
4 Feb 2026 1:54 pm
Ok, let's get started.Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Former Farming Leaders Warn U.S. Agriculture Could Face ‘Widespread Collapse’
A group of past government officials and the former heads of farming associations issued a dire warning to members of Congress.
“it is clear that the current administration’s actions, along with congressional inaction, have increased costs for farm inputs, disrupted overseas and domestic markets, denied agriculture its reliable labor pool, and defunded critical ag research and staffing,” the letter warned.
“Our farmers and ranchers can compete with the world, but they can’t compete with the world with a chaotic set of policy circumstances,” one of the signers, Jon Doggett, the former chief executive of the National Corn Growers Association, said in an interview.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/03/us/p ... =url-share
Don't vote your hard-on, *******
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Feb 2026 1:55 pm
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Feb 2026 1:56 pm
Speaking of you running, watch this:
Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Feb 2026 1:56 pm
Cry to Deezer.Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2026, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑ Try to convince me that you aren't on the Gay Spectrum.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room
Deal:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Feb 2026 1:58 pm
@Blackvegetable
Hey @Deezer Shoove , though I am increasing the frequency of this question, I don't believe it is spamming. It is not being posted repeatedly in the same post. It is no different than what Johhny You does with his Youtube crap. he posts consecutively, but they are not in the same post itself.
Hey @Deezer Shoove , though I am increasing the frequency of this question, I don't believe it is spamming. It is not being posted repeatedly in the same post. It is no different than what Johhny You does with his Youtube crap. he posts consecutively, but they are not in the same post itself.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Feb 2026 2:17 pm
Vegas » 04 Feb 2026, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑ @Blackvegetable
Hey @Deezer Shoove , though I am increasing the frequency of this question, I don't believe it is spamming. It is not being posted repeatedly in the same post. It is no different than what Johhny You does with his Youtube crap. he posts consecutively, but they are not in the same post itself.
And look what happened to him... Jus' sayin'
Please seat yourself.
I like the very things you hate.
I like the very things you hate.
4 Feb 2026 2:20 pm
Blackvegetable » 04 Feb 2026, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Former Farming Leaders Warn U.S. Agriculture Could Face ‘Widespread Collapse’
A group of past government officials and the former heads of farming associations issued a dire warning to members of Congress.
“it is clear that the current administration’s actions, along with congressional inaction, have increased costs for farm inputs, disrupted overseas and domestic markets, denied agriculture its reliable labor pool, and defunded critical ag research and staffing,” the letter warned.
“Our farmers and ranchers can compete with the world, but they can’t compete with the world with a chaotic set of policy circumstances,” one of the signers, Jon Doggett, the former chief executive of the National Corn Growers Association, said in an interview.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/03/us/p ... =url-share
Don't vote your hard-on, *******
decades of progressive policies have destroyed a lot of things...not just farming
good new dickhead....JD Vance is now in charge of rooting out the fraud
he's coming for ya bitches
4 Feb 2026 2:36 pm
He happened to himself. He was born a disaster.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
4 Feb 2026 3:31 pm
stop just sayin', Coward
4 Feb 2026 3:36 pm
4 Feb 2026 3:37 pm
You're a **** idiotnefarious101 » 04 Feb 2026, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ decades of progressive policies have destroyed a lot of things...not just farming
good new dickhead....JD Vance is now in charge of rooting out the fraud
he's coming for ya bitches
Who is online
In total there are 5105 users online :: 13 registered, 17 bots, and 5075 guests
Registered users: Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, Buffalo, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, SouthernFried, nefarious101, sole, ….., Huey, Fuelman
Bots: Feeder, Not, Mediatoolkitbot, okhttp, DuckDuckBot, CriteoBot, proximic, ADmantX, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, NING, curl/7, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, Googlebot, bingbot