Liberal Forum

Election officials usually respond to these allegations by pointing out that there are almost no prosecutions of fraudulent noncitizen voters. Reuters has noted that even the pro-Trump Heritage Foundation’s database of election crimes listed only 24 instances of noncitizens voting in U.S. elections from 2003 to 2023.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/05/opin ... izens.html


24...

In 2020, Grafty lost by 7 million.

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 7:30 am

Election officials usually respond to these allegations by pointing out that there are almost no prosecutions of fraudulent noncitizen voters. Reuters has noted that even the pro-Trump Heritage Foundation’s database of election crimes listed only 24 instances of noncitizens voting in U.S. elections from 2003 to 2023.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/05/opin ... izens.html

24...

In 2020, Grafty lost by 7 million.

If your entire argument rests on “only 24 prosecutions,” you’re not proving the system is clean — you’re proving you don’t understand how detection, enforcement, or statistics work.

Low prosecution numbers don’t mean low violations. They mean low detection, low enforcement, and low political will to pursue cases.

How **** stupid does one have to be not to see this? End of story.
 

MR-7 » 06 Feb 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 8:21 am

If your entire argument rests on “only 24 prosecutions,” you’re not proving the system is clean — you’re proving you don’t understand how detection, enforcement, or statistics work.

Low prosecution numbers don’t mean low violations. They mean low detection, low enforcement, and low political will to pursue cases.

How **** stupid does one have to be not to see this? End of story.

Natch, Ruby...

When confronted with allegations on noncitizens voting in Utah, Lt. Gov. Deidre Henderson, the state’s top election official, initiated a monthslong review of Utah’s approximately 2.1 million registered voters. She and her team found one “confirmed noncitizen.” Just one. And that one noncitizen, while registered, had never voted. 

Idaho, a state of one million voters, ran similar tests in 2024, and they found 36 “very likely” registered noncitizens. That may seem like a lot until you view it in light of claims that statewide elections are altered by such anomalies. Some, but not all, of those 36 people have previously voted, the secretary of state, Phil McGrane, said, but “out of the million-plus registered voters we started with, we’re down to 10 thousandths of a percent” of the overall count — not even close to affecting the outcome. 

Louisiana’s investigation in 2025 netted some 390 noncitizen registrants, 79 of whom had voted in at least one election over the last several decades (out of 2.9 million registrants). Just a few weeks ago, Montana found 23 possible noncitizen registrants (out of approximately 785,000 people registered). And Georgia, in some ways the model for these investigations, found in its 2024 audit 20 registered noncitizens (out of 8.2 million registrations). In my four years in office in Maricopa County overseeing voter registration, I came across a total of two possible instances of noncitizens voting out of some 2.5 million registered voters.


Ibid.

At some point, you ******* **** are gonna have to do the Walk.


 

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 7:30 am

Election officials usually respond to these allegations by pointing out that there are almost no prosecutions of fraudulent noncitizen voters. Reuters has noted that even the pro-Trump Heritage Foundation’s database of election crimes listed only 24 instances of noncitizens voting in U.S. elections from 2003 to 2023.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/05/opin ... izens.html


24...

In 2020, Grafty lost by 7 million.

Contextual facts manifest what kind of thoughts socially practiced in every generation gap living daily here supporting the idea life exceeds personal time adapting in space living spontaneously here one at a time simultaneously at the same time regardless longitude(24hours a rotation), climate sone(temperate level equator to either polar axis) attitude(ideology honored cradle to grave) platitude or rank in society daily here)?

define each ancestor by relative chromosomes in streaming DNA numbers as part of current global population of this species regardless past, current events and tomorrow is more than 12 hours midnight to noon each rotation forward.

You won't respond to my post and if you do, it will be denying what I say has any merit in your nurtured mind.

MR-7 » 06 Feb 2026, 8:21 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 8:21 am

If your entire argument rests on “only 24 prosecutions,” you’re not proving the system is clean — you’re proving you don’t understand how detection, enforcement, or statistics work.

Low prosecution numbers don’t mean low violations. They mean low detection, low enforcement, and low political will to pursue cases.

How **** stupid does one have to be not to see this? End of story.

you’re proving you don’t understand how detection, enforcement, or statistics work.

From a **** *******...

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 8:35 am

From a **** *******...

Typecast soul from social consensus calling a stereotyped by law character a ******* has complete irony over both arguing over where humanity must go tomorrow or else.

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 7:30 am

Election officials usually respond to these allegations by pointing out that there are almost no prosecutions of fraudulent noncitizen voters. Reuters has noted that even the pro-Trump Heritage Foundation’s database of election crimes listed only 24 instances of noncitizens voting in U.S. elections from 2003 to 2023.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/05/opin ... izens.html

24...

In 2020, Grafty lost by 7 million.

Because election officials failed at regulating the vote, they'll be better at investigating the outcome....hey, great argument....by a brain dead morphodite.

RebelGator » 06 Feb 2026, 8:40 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 8:40 am

Because election officials failed at regulating the vote, 

The evidence of which is?

No one gives a **** about fee fees you are too much of a ****** to defend.

 

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 7:30 am

Election officials usually respond to these allegations by pointing out that there are almost no prosecutions of fraudulent noncitizen voters. Reuters has noted that even the pro-Trump Heritage Foundation’s database of election crimes listed only 24 instances of noncitizens voting in U.S. elections from 2003 to 2023.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/05/opin ... izens.html


24...

In 2020, Grafty lost by 7 million.

When stolen identities of registered voters having a habit of not voting cast ballots are used by NGO's giving illegals mail in ballots show up are they detected to be prosecuted in a court of law?

2020, 2022, 2024 elections were done under this methodology nobody discusses in any arena of ideas because it it was in the media, everyone with a brain navigating time daily here would revolt against the chain of command in their own reality.

 ̶B̶l̶a̶c̶k̶v̶e̶g̶e̶t̶a̶b̶l̶e̶ ̶»̶ ̶5̶2̶ ̶m̶i̶n̶u̶t̶e̶s̶ ̶a̶g̶o̶ ̶»̶ ̶w̶r̶o̶t̶e̶:̶ ̶↑̶5̶2̶ ̶m̶i̶n̶u̶t̶e̶s̶ ̶a̶g̶o̶
̶E̶l̶e̶c̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶o̶f̶f̶i̶c̶i̶a̶l̶s̶ ̶u̶s̶u̶a̶l̶l̶y̶ ̶r̶e̶s̶p̶o̶n̶d̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶s̶e̶ ̶a̶l̶l̶e̶g̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶b̶y̶ ̶p̶o̶i̶n̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶o̶u̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶r̶e̶ ̶a̶r̶e̶ ̶a̶l̶m̶o̶s̶t̶ ̶n̶o̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶s̶e̶c̶u̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶f̶r̶a̶u̶d̶u̶l̶e̶n̶t̶ ̶n̶o̶n̶c̶i̶t̶i̶z̶e̶n̶ ̶v̶o̶t̶e̶r̶s̶.̶ ̶R̶e̶u̶t̶e̶r̶s̶ ̶h̶a̶s̶ ̶n̶o̶t̶e̶d̶ ̶t̶h̶a̶t̶ ̶e̶v̶e̶n̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶ ̶p̶r̶o̶-̶T̶r̶u̶m̶p̶ ̶H̶e̶r̶i̶t̶a̶g̶e̶ ̶F̶o̶u̶n̶d̶a̶t̶i̶o̶n̶’̶s̶ ̶d̶a̶t̶a̶b̶a̶s̶e̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶e̶l̶e̶c̶t̶i̶o̶n̶ ̶c̶r̶i̶m̶e̶s̶ ̶l̶i̶s̶t̶e̶d̶ ̶o̶n̶l̶y̶ ̶2̶4̶ ̶i̶n̶s̶t̶a̶n̶c̶e̶s̶ ̶o̶f̶ ̶n̶o̶n̶c̶i̶t̶i̶z̶e̶n̶s̶ ̶v̶o̶t̶i̶n̶g̶ ̶i̶n̶ ̶U̶.̶S̶.̶ ̶e̶l̶e̶c̶t̶i̶o̶n̶s̶ ̶f̶r̶o̶m̶ ̶2̶0̶0̶3̶ ̶t̶o̶ ̶2̶0̶2̶3̶.̶
̶
̶h̶t̶t̶p̶s̶:̶/̶/̶w̶w̶w̶.̶n̶y̶t̶i̶m̶e̶s̶.̶c̶o̶m̶/̶2̶0̶2̶6̶/̶0̶2̶/̶0̶5̶/̶o̶p̶i̶n̶ ̶.̶.̶.̶ ̶i̶z̶e̶n̶s̶.̶h̶t̶m̶l̶
̶
̶2̶4̶.̶.̶.̶
̶
In 2020, Grafty lost by 7 million.

And in 2024, vegetable biden lost
all 7 million that he had 'supposedly"
won in 2020....what happened?

 
 
 

MR-7 » 06 Feb 2026, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 8:47 am

And in 2024, 

Try to focus, Rube....or the ref will stop this.

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 8:35 am

From a **** *******...

And in 2024, vegetable biden lost
all 7 million that he had 'supposedly"
won in 2020....what happened?

 
 

Here's @Zeets2  

The period began on Jan. 20th, 2025 when Trump began firing 1.5 million useless federal bureaucrats which Biden hired in order to inflate his job figures which were pitiful!

Of course, Zeets has no earthly idea how many people are "employed" by the federal gubmint.

Nor can Zeet determine, by looking at a simple line graph, how many were added or lost.

And Zeet went to college.

 
 

MR-7 » 06 Feb 2026, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 8:50 am

And in 2024, vegetable biden lost
all 7 million that he had 'supposedly"
won in 2020....what happened?

Biden didn't run.

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 8:50 am

Try to focus, Rube....or the ref will stop this.

Go ahead COWARD...run. 
 

MR-7 » 06 Feb 2026, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 9:07 am

Go ahead COWARD...run.

This is about FACTS, not the **** you tell yourself 

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 8:58 am

Biden didn't run.

He didn't?   
Approximately 20 months

Joe Biden was in the 2024 presidential run for approximately 20 months, starting from his announcement on April 25, 2023, until he withdrew from the race on July 21, 2024. 

Wikipedia+2

somebody is a LIAR

MR-7 » 06 Feb 2026, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 9:12 am

He didn't?   
Approximately 20 months

Joe Biden was in the 2024 presidential run for approximately 20 months, starting from his announcement on April 25, 2023, until he withdrew from the race on July 21, 2024. 

Wikipedia+2

somebody is a LIAR

But, but, but,....Master MR-7, why didn't he finish?  
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 8:42 am

The evidence of which is?

No one gives a **** about fee fees you are too much of a ****** to defend.

 

The evidence taken was collected to define an event already completed and now interpreting the effects coming up tomorrow really doesn't discuss current events taking place now.

Circle intellectualism exists for one purpose to create realities governing next generation's arrivals each born alive daily here. All this does in series parallel space debating what time is in each time zone evolving forward at the same time, now.

Life reproduces ancestors inhabiting space chronologically here 24/7 between inception of original great great grandparents to adding each great great grandchild living each rotation one a ta time between conception and extinction of each ancestor, ancestral lineage, generation gap added until no more great great grandchild added again.

How genetic outcomes exist in plain sight daily here. All speculation that isn't real is a reality pretending nobody can prove now is eternity factually any generation alive daily here.

Reasonable doubt governs people believing anything is possible at any time alive.

Moral of this post, Methodologies protecting reasonable doubt leave history mapping social behavioral choices made every generation gap honors in each ancestral lineage inhabiting space daily here.

MR-7 » 06 Feb 2026, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 9:12 am

He didn't?   
Approximately 20 months

Joe Biden was in the 2024 presidential run for approximately 20 months, starting from his announcement on April 25, 2023, until he withdrew from the race on July 21, 2024. 

Wikipedia+2

somebody is a LIAR

He wasn't on the ballot, idiot.