Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 4:33 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 4:33 pm

run from your words

I am standing behind my words. YOU on the other hand are sprinting.  Why do they Swedes have Voter ID requirements.  Remember, you claim the are more evolved and they have Voter ID requirements.

Keep running, coward.
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 11:58 am

 

I'm NORTHERN European

The less body hair the more evolved.

Just for when you demand to see your words.  I guess those that are more evolved understand the need for Voter ID.

And PS.  You are an American with no more than half a Swedish (NORTHERN European) bloodline.  I guess you missed out on the MORE EVOLVED part.
 

Huey » 07 Feb 2026, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 8:56 am

Just for when you demand to see your words.  I guess those that are more evolved understand the need for Voter ID.

And PS.  You are an American with no more than half a Swedish (NORTHERN European) bloodline.  I guess you missed out on the MORE EVOLVED part.

I don't get what you think I'm running from.


Try to focus..
 

Johnny » wrote:

02 Feb 1970, 7:17 pm

Huey » 06 Feb 2026, 4:26 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 4:26 pm

Well, I guess Swedes are not as evolved as you claimed.  They have voter ID.

So does Georgia here in the US.. And?

 

If you are following the conversation you understand that my comment destroyed **** Bv's reasoning.

Do try and catch up.

PS.  Since you brought up GA I guess you are aware that in the election following passage of the minority turnout in places like GA saw a sizable increase.  It seems contrary to the racist beliefs of some dems minorities DO NOT have a hard time getting an ID.

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2026, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 8:57 am

Huey » 07 Feb 2026, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 8:56 am

Just for when you demand to see your words.  I guess those that are more evolved understand the need for Voter ID.

And PS.  You are an American with no more than half a Swedish (NORTHERN European) bloodline.  I guess you missed out on the MORE EVOLVED part.

I don't get what you think I'm running from.


Try to focus..
 

 

Another question.  

Your NORTHERN European comment on being more evolved.  

They are so evolved they understand the need for Voter ID.  You who claims to be one of the more evolved, fights against it.  Hence, you are more evolved.

 

Huey » 07 Feb 2026, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 8:52 am

I am standing behind my words. YOU on the other hand are sprinting.  Why do they Swedes have Voter ID requirements.  Remember, you claim the are more evolved and they have Voter ID requirements.

Keep running, coward.

It's irrelevant. 

Why not oblige everyone to wear red hats on Sunday. 


You are running from your lie....again.

Huey » 07 Feb 2026, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 9:01 am

Another question.  

Your NORTHERN European comment on being more evolved.  

They are so evolved they understand the need for Voter ID.  

What need?
 

Try reading the OP

Huey » 07 Feb 2026, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 9:01 am

Another question.  


 

Post the "question"

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2026, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 9:02 am

Huey » 07 Feb 2026, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 8:52 am

I am standing behind my words. YOU on the other hand are sprinting.  Why do they Swedes have Voter ID requirements.  Remember, you claim the are more evolved and they have Voter ID requirements.

Keep running, coward.

It's irrelevant. 

Why not oblige everyone to wear red hats on Sunday. 


You are running from your lie....again.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2026, 9:04 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 9:04 am

Huey » 07 Feb 2026, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 9:01 am

Another question.  

Your NORTHERN European comment on being more evolved.  

They are so evolved they understand the need for Voter ID.  

What need?
 

Try reading the OP

 

 

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2026, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 9:05 am

Huey » 07 Feb 2026, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 9:01 am

Another question.  



 

Post the "question"

 

You are done.  The overwhelming majority of people in this country, of all races, and political parties, favor Voter ID requirements.

Even the country where you claim people a more evolved favor Voter ID.

You lose.

Huey » 07 Feb 2026, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 9:11 am

You are done.  

no...

You remain a rube eager to burden your fellow Americans with an entirely frivolous obligation.

And your only argument for so doing is "Because Sweden.."

Huey » 07 Feb 2026, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 8:52 am

I am standing behind my words. YOU on the other hand are sprinting.  Why do they Swedes have Voter ID requirements.  Remember, you claim the are more evolved and they have Voter ID requirements.

Keep running, coward.
 

Your genetic time stands behind your vocabulary describing how you behave after birth, not why you exist since conceived. Understand the difference living spontaneously adapting in space simultaneously with all other reproductions equally adapting in time daily here.

Realities are intellectually made to expand natural time living into a segmented way to exist individually here managing time alive in social circles of geographical time displaced living eternally separated by personal heart beats and brain navigating time lived after birth regardless ancestral lineage and generation gaps combined so far.

Principles Of Evolving Persons Living Everyday, PEOPLE are ancestors before they become citizens to ideologies suggesting life exceeds adapting in plain sight.

the actual difference between piece of mind and brain at peace with living equally alive now. Try it some time.

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2026, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 9:15 am

Huey » 07 Feb 2026, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 9:11 am

You are done.  

no...

You remain a rube eager to burden your fellow Americans with an entirely frivolous obligation.

And your only argument for so doing is "Because Sweden.."

 

You mean the same obligation that the overwhelming majority of Americans support and Sweden, a plan you Brag is more evolved, has in place.

Stop Editing.  You do that when you lost.  You remain a loser.  

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 6:33 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 6:33 pm

Wait for it...

Because its governor and Secretary of State were both Republicans.

Your question was answered.

OK, we'll revisit that subject when the investigation finds tens of thousands of illegal votes from 2020 should have given the Georgia win to Trump.  It's the impetus needed to pass the Save Act, forcing in voter ID laws.

Now, just acknowledge the FACT that Trump has fired thousands of federal workers and has made it easier to fire 50,000 more useless bureaucrats, which you've been  reluctant to admit despite the obvious proof:

Trump administration lays off thousands of federal workers during government shutdown
CNN By Tami Luhby, Annie Grayer, Alayna Treene

More than 4,000 federal employees received layoff notices as part of the Trump administration’s effort to reshape the government while shutdown, according to a court filing Friday. The filing provides greater insight into an announcement from President Donald Trump’s budget chief earlier in the day that the administration had begun government-wide reductions in force that had been anticipated since federal funding lapsed Oct 1.“The RIFs have begun,” OMB Director Russell Vought posted on X, Reduction in Forces notices had gone out to employees at the departments of Commerce, Education, Energy, Health & Human Services, Housing & Urban Development, Homeland Security and Treasury, according to department spokespeople, union representatives and sources directly impacted.

 

Trump Has Forced Out Nearly 10% Of The Federal Workforce
“We’re seeing the arson of our government,” warned Max Stier of Partnership for Public Service, which has been tracking people's lost jobs since January.
Huff Post By Jennifer Bendery Aug 26, 2025

 WASHINGTON – More than 199,000 federal workers have left their jobs or have been forced out by the Trump administration since Jan 2025. That’s nearly 10% of the entire federal civilian workforce, which was composed of about 2.3 million employees at the start of the year.“We’re seeing the arson of our government,” Max Stier, president and CEO of Partnership for Public Service, told HuffPost. “The numbers are stunning. We can count 200,000, and the administration said 300,000, by the end of the year.”

 

Trump administration plans to reclassify 50,000 federal workers, making them easier to fire
Feb 5, 2026 CNN By Tami Luhby

In its latest effort to weaken the federal workforce, the Trump administration issued a rule on Thursday that would shift an estimated 50,000 senior career staffers into a new category that would make them easier to fire.

The controversial rule allows agencies to reclassify federal employees involved in policy into at-will positions that don’t provide the same job protections that other career workers have. It will affect an estimated 2% of the federal workforce.

A main concern among federal worker unions and advocates is that the rule would eliminate these staffers’ ability to appeal any disciplinary action or termination before an independent body.

Still refuse to acknowledge it, dickhead?

 
 

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 10:23 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 10:23 pm

Don't sound like winning to me...

More like you need to get it waxed.

You're right, it sounded more like beggaring to me, hence the post, sidestepper...

speaking of waxing...looks like you got it done...



Nice job...
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2026, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 8:57 am

I don't get what you think I'm running from.

Try to focus..

^^^^^^^^^^^^^.....The guys at the [[[JWO SOCIAL ENGINEERING DEPT]]] laugh and "high five" one another whenever they see proof that their program to effeminize the American Male has been such a huge success....  

*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Feb 2026, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 2:00 pm

^^^^^^^^^^^^^.....The guys at the [[[JWO SOCIAL ENGINEERING DEPT]]] laugh and "high five" one another whenever they see proof that their program to effeminize the American Male has been such a huge success....

I'm a Class 1 Sire...

You are an embarrassment to your race 
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2026, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 3:14 pm

I'm a Class 1 Sire...

You are an embarrassment to your race

Yes or course....every "Class 1 Alpha Male " spends 90% of every waking hour making 100s of posts at internet forums like you......rain or shine  
 

*GHETTOBLASTER » 07 Feb 2026, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 4:22 pm

Yes or course....every "Class 1 Alpha Male " spends 90% of every waking hour making 100s of posts at internet forums like you......rain or shine

the omegas nip at ankles, weeping.

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2026, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 4:25 pm

the omegas nip at ankles, weeping.

I observed you demanding answers to your questions again, while still evading everyone else. Therefore, I will smothering your stupid *** with this again:



Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.

Blackvegetable » 07 Feb 2026, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑

07 Feb 2026, 4:25 pm

the omegas nip at ankles, weeping.

Maybe in your next life you'll work up the courage to try out for the HS football team...instead of playing clarinet in the Pep Band?