Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 09 Feb 2026, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2026, 4:49 pm

will those do?

Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.

Blackvegetable » 08 Feb 2026, 5:48 pm » wrote: ↑

08 Feb 2026, 5:48 pm

Show me.

**** your demands. You don't answer anyone else's questions, so nobody owes you anything.
1. You probably still don't know the drill, do you?


Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 4:17 pm

Facts, not fee fees

 
fact....The Biden Admin allowed over 10 million undocumented people to cross the American border.
....anything else that you can conjure up won't change that fact.....
Hopefully, we won't see another Democrat sitting the Oval Office for a very long time.

jefftec » 10 Feb 2026, 1:06 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 1:06 am

 
fact....The Biden Admin allowed over 10 million 

****.

Blackvegetable » 06 Feb 2026, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 7:30 am

Election officials usually respond to these allegations by pointing out that there are almost no prosecutions of fraudulent noncitizen voters. Reuters has noted that even the pro-Trump Heritage Foundation’s database of election crimes listed only 24 instances of noncitizens voting in U.S. elections from 2003 to 2023.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/05/opin ... izens.html

24...

In 2020, Grafty lost by 7 million.

If ANY of that were true... WHY would Democrats be SO TERRIFIED of the following?:

1)  REMOVING "Dominion Voting Machines" from use, that have a HISTORY of being used to enable voter FRAUD !

2)  Ending "Mail in Voting" that FURTHER allows voting and elections to be Manipulated, and FALSIFIED ! and...

3)  WHY does it NOW take WEEKS to complete the COUNTING of Voter Ballots, WHEN 30+ years ago, it could be completed the NIGHT of the election?

It seems like the more sophisticated we get with our "Voting Systems & Processes", the MORE potential for FRAUD we are injecting into the SYSTEM & PROCESS... AND the LONGER it takes to COMPLETE the counting... THE MORE TIME malicious agents of election have to perpetrate CORRUPTION and FRAUD... have to PERPETRATE the CORRUPTION and FRAUD !!

THAT ALONE is enough to make a person THINK... and UNTIL technology can be implemented WITHOUT the possibility of CORRUPTION and FRAUD... America's election system should be SIMPLIFIED, and MADE MORE SECURE, as follows :

a)  Vote Paper ballots on the day of the election ONLY !

b)  Voters need to be REGISTERED before election day, and be verified with photo ID at the polling station on Election Day, BEFORE voting !

c)  Votes are counted as they are voted, and then RECOUNTED, and TABULATED by appropriate & authorized election monitors, the evening of the election... Vote tabulations are verified that the two numbers match... and count the data is electronically forwarded to Election Central

d)  All paper ballots and associated electronic data are to be secured and impounded (under lock & key and video surveillance) after the election, and

e)  ANY violations of the election process by anyone... will be subject to both FINES, JAIL, and other established LAWS for such violations!

 

ConservativeWave » 10 Feb 2026, 8:13 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 8:13 am

If ANY of that were true... WHY would Democrats be SO TERRIFIED of the following?:


 

That isn't the question..

 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 6:46 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 6:46 am

****.

Well who allowed this disgusting border disaster to go on line it did?? Shirley Temple??

….do you need an intervention or something….damn…

 

jefftec » 10 Feb 2026, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 10:00 am

Well who allowed this disgusting border disaster to go on line it did?? Shirley Temple??

….do you need an intervention or something….damn…

Will this be a rational exchange or one informed exclusively by the FOX/ConHateradio perspective? 

Blackvegetable » 09 Feb 2026, 4:49 pm » wrote: ↑

09 Feb 2026, 4:49 pm

will those do?

Not when you change my response, it doesn't!
I NEVER said Trump fired 1.5 million federal workers.
But Biden DID hire 1.5 million ADDITIONAL federal workers.  Those are the facts!:

Since President Biden took office, over 1.5 million new jobs have been created in the federal government, including 70,000 new bureaucratic positions reported in June 2024. However, this has been accompanied by cuts in other sectors, such as 8,000 manufacturing jobs.

Zeets2 » 10 Feb 2026, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 11:30 am

Not when you change my response, it doesn't!
I NEVER said Trump fired 1.5 million federal workers.
But Biden DID hire 1.5 million ADDITIONAL federal workers.  Those are the facts!:

I didn't change anything....

I NEVER said Trump fired 1.5 million federal workers.

Does this sound like you?

Hasn't Trump fired the federal "make work" bureaucrats that Biden hired

But Biden DID hire 1.5 million ADDITIONAL federal workers.  

No...

Net federal payrolls increased by about 130,000 under Biden, after rising by roughly 75,000 under Grafty (adjusted for census employment).

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 11:44 am

I didn't change anything....

Does this sound like you?

No...

Net federal payrolls increased by about 130,000 under Biden, after rising by roughly 75,000 under Grafty (adjusted for census employment).

Where were we? Oh yeah, you were continuing your campaign of cowardice. Keep running: 

Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 11:44 am

I didn't change anything....

Does this sound like you?

No...

Net federal payrolls increased by about 130,000 under Biden, after rising by roughly 75,000 under Grafty (adjusted for census employment).

****!
Here are the facts again, liar!:

Chairman Smith: Big Government Wins Again
July 05, 2024

“Hiring paper pushers and IRS agents does nothing to help small businesses struggling to make payroll.”
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith (MO-08) issued the following statement after the Bureau of Labor Statistics released the June 2024 jobs report:
“Bidenomics continues to put the interests of big government over workers and families. President Biden has created more than 1.5 million new jobs for bureaucrats since he took office, paid for by higher inflation-causing spending and increased borrowing costs. Todays’ jobs report is no different: there were 70,000 new bureaucrats put on payroll, while 8,000 manufacturing jobs were cut. New jobs should be the result of a growing economy, not more government spending. Hiring paper pushers and IRS agents does nothing to help small businesses struggling to make payroll.

Don't forget, Trump immediately stopped the Biden order to hire 87,000 new IRS agents WHICH HE WANTED TO HAVE ARMED WITH GUNS!

Thought you left-wing idiots HATED guns!
But it was OK if the corrupt, demented, pedophile president that YOU voted for wanted them for the federal work force, right?

 
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 10:21 am » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 10:21 am

Will this be a rational exchange or one informed exclusively by the FOX/ConHateradio perspective?

……strange there seems to be a one-sided rational exchange when yet again, ……oh yes, again, you require me to question what I see with my very own eyes. 
……what difference does it make who decimates information? Especially if it’s accurate information?   If they report a border crisis, that’s what happened. 
 

Zeets2 » 10 Feb 2026, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 12:52 pm

****!
Here are the facts again, liar!:

Don't forget, Trump immediately stopped the Biden order to hire 87,000 new IRS agents WHICH HE WANTED TO HAVE ARMED WITH GUNS!

Thought you left-wing idiots HATED guns!
But it was OK if the corrupt, demented, pedophile president that YOU voted for wanted them for the federal work force, right?

The short version is

No....that doesn't tell us anything about net additions to federal payroll under Biden. 

But the graph I posted days ago does.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 2:55 pm

The short version is

No....that doesn't tell us anything about net additions to federal payroll under Biden. 

But the graph I posted days ago does.
 

all those half baked statistics since the shutdown with covid came in Trump's 4th year. ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha.

MR-7 » 06 Feb 2026, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

06 Feb 2026, 8:50 am

And in 2024, vegetable biden lost
all 7 million that he had 'supposedly"
won in 2020....what happened?

The electorate failed to appear and cast their votes due to a variety of factors including:
 "How could you see such a huge vote differential in just a short four-year period?" Gesiotto Gilbert said in a video posted on X, formerly Twitter, on Wednesday. "That's something we've never really seen before."

Danielle Vinson, a professor of politics and international affairs at Furman University in South Carolina, suggested misogyny may have played a part in people not coming out for Harris this year."There is a small but significant portion of our country who cannot quite wrap their minds around the idea of a woman being president," Vinson told Newsweek."They are fine with women senators or governors, but they pause at thinking a woman can handle national security and foreign affairs. Trump played that up in his comments frequently.

"That may explain some of why Democratic Senate candidates did better than Harris in a lot of states. I can't really think of a policy reason that explains why someone votes for [Democrat] Ruben Gallego for Senate and Donald Trump for President in Arizona."University of Michigan professor Jonathan Hanson said voters in key demographics, such as minorities and the working class, who felt the economic pinch in recent years ultimately rejected the Democrats on Tuesday.

"Largely, voters have felt economic pain due to the post-COVID inflationary period, and they're taking it out on Biden [and Harris]," Hanson told the BBC.A similar sentiment was expressed in an opinion piece by Andrew Prokop, senior politics correspondent at left-leaning news site Vox.

https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-mill ... on-1981954

The "rigged and stolen" lie got Ashli Babbitt killed......

Blackvegetable » 10 Feb 2026, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Feb 2026, 2:55 pm

The short version is

No....that doesn't tell us anything about net additions to federal payroll under Biden. 

But the graph I posted days ago does.

And what do the FACTS tell you about the tens of thousands of worthless federal bureaucrats that Trump has fired that you refuse to acknowledge?
 
 

Zeets2 » 11 Feb 2026, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

11 Feb 2026, 9:54 am

And what do the FACTS tell you about the tens of thousands of worthless federal bureaucrats that Trump has fired that you refuse to acknowledge?

It is now YOUR turn to answer. 

Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

Cry to Deezer.
Ok BV. Let's compare our definitions of Survivorship Bias and why yours is as useless as you. - Liberal Forum Political Chat Room

Deal:

Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.  His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors