Liberal Forum

Trump aides struggle with how to spend $500 billion more on military

The White House budget chief was among those who internally objected to the defense secretary’s plan to increase military spending by roughly 50 percent, sources say.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... -military/


**** g'ddammned dumbasses...


"BALLROOM!"

"Tell me you're gonna send your $5,000 check back......"

Why do people make such a fuss about abortion?
 

Blackvegetable » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

18 minutes ago

"Tell me you're gonna send your $5,000 check back......"

Why do people make such a fuss about abortion?

Did you have to wear your older sister's dresses, fruitcake?
 

RebelGator » 21 Feb 2026, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 7:09 am

Did you 

https://youtu.be/RTHf02hGq_o?si=BzLLSFMw_-aJkpER

Folks’re petulantly bludgeoning their way past fundamental evolutionary instincts with their **** foreheads. 

Why? **** if I know. Maybe if I were a goat psychiatrist, I’d understand.

https://showercapblog.com/tiresome-tyra ... m-tickles/




 

Blackvegetable » 21 Feb 2026, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 6:51 am

Trump aides struggle with how to spend $500 billion more on military

The White House budget chief was among those who internally objected to the defense secretary’s plan to increase military spending by roughly 50 percent, sources say.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... -military/

**** g'ddammned dumbasses...

"BALLROOM!"

The ballroom funding has been secured through private donations.   Have you made your donation?
 

BuckNaked » 21 Feb 2026, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 9:43 am

The ballroom funding has been secured through private donations.   Have you made your donation?

You mean "tributes" or "bribes".
I bet you made yours on your knees, Cinderfella...

We have plenty of money. Cut spending and fraud and you could cut taxes in half.

PhiloBeddo » 21 Feb 2026, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 10:46 am

We have plenty of money. Cut spending and fraud and you could cut taxes in half.

You can't just print the shyt forever..  Crypto will make all currency useless...

Numbers don't lie... That's why they give us none.. The balance sheet is going to shyt fast.. Debt exceeds GDP now.

 
Before you reply it is Democrats fault..  please do some critical thinking as to how that will solve anything...

PhiloBeddo » 21 Feb 2026, 10:46 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 10:46 am

We have plenty of money. Cut spending and fraud and you could cut taxes in half.

cut the fraud and we’d be in the black…
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Feb 2026, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 10:25 am

You mean "tributes" or "bribes".
I bet you made yours on your knees, Cinderfella...

I have donated nothing you lost that bet 

ROG62 » 21 Feb 2026, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 11:10 am

cut the fraud and we’d be in the black…

Let me explain something fundamental to you, Princess..

Fraud is everpresent in any financial endeavor managed by human beings.

It is a cost of doing business.

But, like everything else, the effort to control fraud is not without cost...accordingly, adults grasp that you cannot eliminate it.


 

BuckNaked » 21 Feb 2026, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 2:37 pm

I have donated nothing you lost that bet

Maybe literally...



 

Blackvegetable » 21 Feb 2026, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 6:51 am

Trump aides struggle with how to spend $500 billion more on military

The White House budget chief was among those who internally objected to the defense secretary’s plan to increase military spending by roughly 50 percent, sources say.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... -military/

**** g'ddammned dumbasses...

"BALLROOM!"

Defense of the country is kinda mentioned in the constitution,       Unlike some of the boondoggle spending you have voted for
 

Huey » 22 Feb 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 10:14 am

Defense of the country is kinda mentioned in the constitution,       Unlike some of the boondoggle spending you have voted for

Specifically? 

Blackvegetable » 22 Feb 2026, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 10:23 am

Specifically?

You are not familiar with the constitution?  How sad.  Until you take the pledge you don't have question privileges.  ;)

You will have to make your point without questions.  You are not capable,

Huey » 22 Feb 2026, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 10:25 am

You are not familiar with the constitution?  How sad.  Until you take the pledge you don't have question privileges.  

You will have to make your point without questions.  You are not capable,

You are not familiar with the constitution?  

Wait for it!!!!!

You will have to make your point without questions.  

Post the rule.

You are not capable,

24/7/365

You made reference to "boondoggles", when asked to specify you @*HooooooeyVaginaed...

As is your cowardly wont. 
 

Blackvegetable » 22 Feb 2026, 9:16 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 9:16 am

Maybe literally...

I’m not giving no body political donations.   Would you like to contribute to the Human Fund?

Huey » 22 Feb 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 10:14 am

Blackvegetable » 21 Feb 2026, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑

21 Feb 2026, 6:51 am

Trump aides struggle with how to spend $500 billion more on military

The White House budget chief was among those who internally objected to the defense secretary’s plan to increase military spending by roughly 50 percent, sources say.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... -military/

**** g'ddammned dumbasses...

"BALLROOM!"

Defense of the country is kinda mentioned in the constitution,       Unlike some of the boondoggle spending you have voted for
 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 22 Feb 2026, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 10:23 am

Huey » 22 Feb 2026, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 10:14 am

Defense of the country is kinda mentioned in the constitution,       Unlike some of the boondoggle spending you have voted for

Specifically? 

 

You made reference to "boondoggles", when asked to specify you @*HooooooeyVaginaed...

Idiot, YOU did not specify.  There were two points made in that post.  YOU did not specify which point.  Plus, before I answer questions You must take the pledge to answer on a one for one bases.  I PLEDGE THAT. I guess your ignorance will be on display if you do as well.

Not for nothing, it is odd I am paying much more for health insurance than I was before Obamacare.  It is also odd we spent so much money on EVs for both the manufacturer and the buyer.  Can't find anything like that in the constitution.

Blackvegetable » 22 Feb 2026, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 10:33 am

Huey » 22 Feb 2026, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 10:25 am

You are not familiar with the constitution?  How sad.  Until you take the pledge you don't have question privileges.  

You will have to make your point without questions.  You are not capable,

You are not familiar with the constitution?  

Wait for it!!!!!

You will have to make your point without questions.  

Post the rule.

You are not capable,

24/7/365

You made reference to "boondoggles", when asked to specify you @*HooooooeyVaginaed...

As is your cowardly wont. 
 

 

 

Huey » 22 Feb 2026, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

22 Feb 2026, 10:42 am

Idiot, YOU did not specify.  There were two points made in that post.  YOU did not specify which point.  Plus, before I answer questions You must take the pledge to answer on a one for one bases.  I PLEDGE THAT. I guess your ignorance will be on display if you do as well.

Not for nothing, it is odd I am paying much more for health insurance than I was before Obamacare.  It is also odd we spent so much money on EVs for both the manufacturer and the buyer.  Can't find anything like that in the constitution.

Focus, @*LyingLittleMelty

Not for nothing, it is odd I am paying much more for health insurance than I was before Obamacare.

That's a really novel insight, Tiny....for how many things are you paying LESS than you did 16 years ago?

And I must assume that you will now proceed to demonstrate the causation.