STFU YOU COWARD POS ***Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Kuwait mistakenly downs 3 U.S. fighter jets
This has "Hegseth" written all over it....
so much for "Art of the Deal"Blackvegetable » 14 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Kuwait mistakenly downs 3 U.S. fighter jets
This has "Hegseth" written all over it....
An AC 130 would be more appropriate.Blackvegetable » 28 Feb 2026, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Pete Hegseth had led the first wave in a Twin Otter....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havill ... Twin_Otter
LOLBlackvegetable » 28 Feb 2026, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Pete Hegseth had led the first wave in a Twin Otter....
no spam
Real challenge.
Blackvegetable » Today, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ Kuwait mistakenly downs 3 U.S. fighter jets
This has "Hegseth" written all over it....
LMAO!Blackvegetable » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑Real challenge.
You missed the point....again.
District Attorney mistakenly swallows DNA evidence.Blackvegetable » Today, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑ Kuwait mistakenly downs 3 U.S. fighter jets
This has "Hegseth" written all over it....
Speaking of you being more enthused to dodge, check this out:Blackvegetable » 28 Feb 2026, 7:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Pete Hegseth had led the first wave in a Twin Otter....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_Havill ... Twin_Otter
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Speaking of you refusing challenges, due to your cowardice, check this out:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Deal: Veghead claimed he already answered this question. LOL. If Veghead proves that he did indeed answer the survivorship multiple choice question below, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back. I am permabanned. Gone. Like a fart in the wind. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. His evidence must precede the timestamp upon when this challenge has been agreed upon by both parties. Moreover, he must answer immediately when the mods say "go," That next post. Not the next 600 posts. Either Cannon or Deezer mods.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
RebelGator » 38 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ District Attorney mistakenly swallows DNA evidence.
This has Kameltoe written all over it.
When are you gonna learn, Buckwheat?
When you get counter punched all the way to Hell?



flew right over his head
that’s rich, brown, being you never make one…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom viewforum.php?f=3